Thank you for skipping the entire thread and adding absolutely nothing of value to the conversation.
...
I have lived in Mississauga since 2003. Prior to that - as an adult - I have lived in Etobicoke, the Annex and Woodbridge, so aside from living right in the heart of DT Toronto, you could say I've tasted much of what the GTA has to offer.
My personal preference is to live somewhere that I can walk to places from. Some place like College St or Avenue Rd or Y+E suits my lifestyle perfectly if I don't factor work into the equation, but considering that I am in business and the most convenient/strategic place for my business is in the industrial area just west of Pearson, it doesn't make sense to force myself to live in a more urban setting. I do need to drive every day as my work often has me meeting with clients or picking up / dropping off goods - and since don't believe in long commutes I choose to live within a 10 minute drive of our location, or "east Mississauga". It's convenient and it's practical by many measures.
That said, I think Mississauga could be so much more than it is. So many things could have been done better, but being next to the largest city in the country was what allowed some of the bad decisions to be made. What London or Ottawa or Calgary would do in growth times would obviously be different than a place 30km from DT Toronto, and it shows.
But...
While it is not as good as it could be, it is clearly not as bad as some would have you believe. What it lacks in a "core identity" (or wherever terms you wish to use) doesn't have to be permanent. People harp on Hurontario being wide enough to land a plane on, but it's exactly the same width as Broadway or Park Ave. What old neighborhoods it does have are disjointed (Streetsville, Port Credit) but with vast undeveloped spaces and ease of re-development of even more space - the flaws aren't permanent and the mindset HAS changed. Sure, there are always opponents to change but the majority of those who live here DO want a city with its own core, with an identity and with better integration of people into the space.
While the cul-de-sacs and cookie cutter subdivisions won't go away - and transit/traffic flow will be less than perfect - many portions of Mississauga will get much more dense. Square One won't go away, but the parking lots and empty areas around the MCC will form a "core" that will be far more urban and livable than many cities with a far "bigger" reputation. Anyone who's been to Atlanta or Dallas or Phoenix can confirm this, but with a little luck and some decent planners, it can work quite well.
It's entirely possible that they screw it up even more, but how about we wait and see the actual result first? The city didn't do so well through its "grade school" growing up years, but is now entering a more mind-opening "high school" period and seems to realize that it as to smarten up if it plans to have any success in the future. There are some good things in place and with a few good ideas and a little hard work, it can become "all grown up" at some point. It's far too young and unfinished a city at this point to really know how it'll end up.