pman
Senior Member
Go Global Warming!
Isn't that forbidden speech?
BTW Toronto doesn't do all that well on Monocle's city rankings.
Go Global Warming!
Monocle ... is that a club for maniacal dictators?BTW Toronto doesn't do all that well on Monocle's city rankings.
Isn't that forbidden speech?
BTW Toronto doesn't do all that well on Monocle's city rankings.
Speaking of public transit, has anyone gone on any of Tokyo's extensive transit system? There are endless Toyko Metro lines all over the greater Tokyo area, not to mention about two dozen JR (Japan Rail) lines that are super-efficient and rarely late. It's amazing how they can co-ordinate hundreds of trains yet our TTC still struggles with 2 subway lines! And the Tokyo Metro and JR isn't even the extent of what they have. As mentioned earlier, it takes a unified vision to plan, strategize, and implement something with this level of success.
true. I always wonder why TTC ran into so many "signal problem" when it has two lines only. What will happen if we do have someday 5 or 6 lines? How did London, New York, Shanghai, and Tokyo etc manage those system 5 times the size of ours?
Also the priority light for LRT is such a joke. Yesterday I was taking 510, and from College to King St, the vehicle I took ran into every red light between that short distance. I mean, literally EVERYTHING SINGLE ONE.
TTC apparently needs to learn a lot to be an efficient and world class transit. Right now, let's just admit it is simply bad.
If anyone doesn't believe in global warming, I invite them to check out the July weather forecast from 20,000 years ago.Why should it be forbidden? Global warming itself is a theory at best, and a scam at worst. Everyone should have the right to question its validity.
I don't disagree with you. But googling to find signal problems with the London Underground is not gonna make the TTC situation look any better. London subway has the excuse of being 150 years old. We don't.
Our problem seems to be too forgiving about the mistakes and always finding excuses for the apparent failure. Such self denial is not gonna help but only makes any progress even slower.
We actually have 3 subway lines. But the 5 station Sheppard stub can hardly be considered a subway line.
Why should it be forbidden? Global warming itself is a theory at best, and a scam at worst. Everyone should have the right to question its validity.
Even if it were real, isn't it obvious it does a lot more good to Canada than bad? Look at 95% of Canada's land that is neither arable nor habitable. From a global perspective, there is also both pros and cons. Just because some ambitious politicians hired a group of biased scientists to prove it does not make it real or irrefutable.
Canada is stuck with being a small country largely due its climate, and many of its problems are due to it too. The fact that frigid places like Montreal can become a vibrant metropolis with 3-4 million people is already a miracle. Imagine what Toronto and Montreal can be if they had New York or London's weather.
If anyone doesn't believe in global warming, I invite them to check out the July weather forecast from 20,000 years ago.
Let's not forget many places are a lot colder than normal.
Global warming is just a theory, but I have yet to see any credible evidence to disprove it. So as far as I'm concerned global warming is very real. But global warming is very good for Canada so I'm all for it. In 100 years the US of A will be a hot desert and 90% of Canada will be a wonderful place with mild temperatures.
Global warming is an inaccurate term that was abandoned by climate scientists years ago. The term now used is global climate change. Some areas of the globe are getting colder while others are getting warmer.
evidence for global warming is sporadic and spurious. If the earth is so warm, why East Europe is experiencing the coldest winter ever that hundreds died of hypothermia?
The earth has a very long history and the temperature record we have is like 0.00001% of it. How can one be so convinced that it is a long term trend, instead of just a short term fluctuation? 50 years, is very short for the earth, and data based on that should be taken with caution.
If even it is warmer, how do we know it is because of human activities? Millions of factors way more greater than the cars we drive can contribute to it.
I am not saying it is wrong, but I don't buy it unless there is sufficient evidence. Clowns like Dalton McGuinty is using it as a political tool to get ahead in his career. It is easy for politicians to hire and pay "experts" to issue reports to support whatever they want the educated people to believe. I work for the government, and I know how it works. If your research evidence shows otherwise, it will simply be ignore. Only evidence supporting the already determined conclusion will be taken into account.