News   Aug 23, 2024
 1.3K     0 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 2.2K     4 
News   Aug 23, 2024
 562     0 

Wheel-Trans: 'No easy fix'

Prometheus The Supremo

►Member №41+⅜◄
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 23, 2007
Messages
4,107
Reaction score
5
Location
a strange reality, bizarro toronto
'No easy fix' for Wheel-Trans


Even though Wheel-Trans is escaping the budget chopping block, service is overloaded, underfunded
August 18, 2007
Helen Henderson
Living Reporter

Welcome to the nightmare known as paratransit in Toronto, a system that every year carries 2.1 million passengers who cannot use regular subways, buses and streetcars to get where they need to go.

Reliable transit is crucial to giving people with disabilities the access they deserve to such things as medical appointments, community events, education and jobs.

Yet workers using paratransit throughout the GTA "cannot assure that they will be on time," says Stephen Largy, manager of Mississauga Practice Firm 4 Persons with Disabilities, a job-finding program.

"It's common for them to wait anywhere from 30 to 90 minutes because their scheduled ride is running late. They also can be relatively sure they won't be able to get to work on days when weather provides even the smallest delay."

Worn-out vehicles, already older than their scheduled lifespan, have been restricted to carrying no more than three wheelchairs at a time. Managers say they want to ensure vehicles can be evacuated quickly and safely in the event of a breakdown.

When customers try to complain about service, they say they get nowhere. "My complaints are acknowledged," says Di Virgilio, who has written everybody she could think of, right up to Premier Dalton McGuinty. "But nothing is ever done."

In a cash-starved city demanding hefty cuts to the overall Toronto Transit Commission budget, Wheel-Trans has been told its current $64 million budget is not at risk. But that is cold comfort to those who, unlike their able-bodied peers, say they can never be sure they'll get the ride they need because the system is already overloaded and underfunded.

"This sends a message that where I need to go and what I want to do is not important," says Terri-Lynn Langdon, a PhD student at York University. "It carries with it the pervasive attitude that persons with disabilities can just stay at home and, further, that the endeavours of people with disabilities are trivial."

Efforts to add elevators and other equipment necessary to make all subway trains, buses and streetcars wheelchair accessible are priorities, says councillor Joe Mihevc, head of Toronto's disability issues committee. "With a population that's aging, the political commitment is high at all levels."

But even if everything proceeds on schedule (35 of 68 subway stations have elevators, and three to four are added every year), it will be 11 years before the work is complete. Meantime, Wheel-Trans is the only alternative. And demand for its services will rise as the risk of disability increases in step with the average age.

"Without the province stepping up funding, we can't do anything to improve Wheel-Trans service," says TTC chair Adam Giambrone. Additional staff is needed to help meet all requests for rides, he says. "This is a separate issue (from funding for regular transit). We need to make it a separate `ask.'"

So don't be surprised to see people with disabilities stepping up efforts to get the message out as Ontario prepares to go to the polls Oct. 10.

Twelve years ago, Wheel-Trans' scheduling system was ranked as one of the best in the world by the prestigious Smithsonian Institution, says general superintendent Bob Thacker, the guy with whom the buck stops. Today, Thacker admits, that system is as badly outdated as the buses it runs.

"People are right; they do wait too long," Thacker says. "It's always a question of balancing cost and quality."

In fact, Wheel-Trans users figure a trip that would take an able-bodied commuter one hour may take them three to four times that. That's because they must build in added time, including, realistically, an extra 30 to 60 minutes either side of their pick-up window.

Thacker says Wheel-Trans is working on a redesign that includes global positioning locators on buses and a new "batch" scheduling capable of organizing hundreds of trips instantly. It also hopes to hire additional staff to help handle reservations and will be providing more services through the Internet.

He says the group has been scouring the continent for low-floor, wheelchair-accessible buses to replace the current fleet. New vehicles are being ordered. But it will be years before they are all on stream.

In the meantime, maintenance superintendent Ian Jordan and staff work literally day and night to keep what Wheel-Trans has up and running.

For customers who have some degree of mobility, Wheel-Trans uses sedans and vans under contract from 11 private taxi companies. Although the taxi drivers must undergo special training to be assigned Wheel-Trans clients, many customers complain they lack sensitivity.

Wheel-Trans is by no means alone in failing to meet all the challenges of providing an efficient, customer-friendly paratransit system.

The problems experienced in Toronto today were commonly expressed during a series of hearings in the United States following the passage 17 years ago of the Americans With Disabilities Act, which mandates equal opportunity and accessibility throughout every aspect of life.

Since then, service in the U.S. is said to have improved overall. But, as Wheel-Trans officials point out, south of the border the federal government provides 80 per cent of funding for paratransit.

It's a very different story in Canada, where disability advocates argue that underfunding of reliable transit is one of the reasons as many as 80 per cent of people with disabilities are underemployed or unemployed, according to the Canadian Association of Independent Living Centres.

Largy, manager of the Mississauga job-finding program, concedes there is "no easy fix" for accessible transportation until society understands the importance of meeting the needs of people with disabilities.

The TTC's advisory committee on accessible transportation, which includes members with disabilities, meets monthly to consider all aspects of the problem, such as making sure the gap between platform and subway train is safe for wheelchairs using the main transit system.

Even if Toronto's entire fleet of buses, subway cars and streetcars were wheelchair-accessible tomorrow, Wheel-Trans would still be needed for electric wheelchair users on inclement days, on certain types of routes and for certain customers.

But Thacker envisions the time when most people with disabilities use the main system most of the time and the service now so overburdened has room to show just how good it could be.

In future, instead of taking customers across town, "we'll take you to the subway," he says, "and we'll phone to tell you we're 10 minutes away from picking you up."

Already, he says, $200,000 has been budgeted to develop a travel-training system to help those nervous about switching to mainstream transit.

But Di Virgilio, whose education at York gets back into high gear in September, fears change won't come soon enough.

"The problems run so deep," she says. "And I have a haunting feeling that accessibility will be the thing that suffers as budget cuts take effect."

"We are in crisis," says one observer of the whole operation. "There's nothing wrong with admitting that. Nothing will change until we do."



BY THE NUMBERS

50,000
Number of registered Wheel-Trans clients

30,000
Number who actively use the service

3
Number of clients allowed on a vehicle at any one time

$64 million
Annual budget

2.1 million
Riders a year

458
Employees

15
Taking reservations at peak periods

148
Buses

140
Accessible vehicles under contract


______________________________________


it's depressing. :( 11 years is too long of a wait.
 
Steve Munro has some very interesting and good points on Wheel-Trans: a bad dispatching system, plus the fact that it is a mandated service by the province, which of course, does not pay nearly enough. Wheel-Trans is interesting because it is operated by the same agency as operates the regular netwoek, something not found elsewhere in Ontario except Ottawa. This means Wheel-Trans comes out of the same budget as the rest of the system (a problem) but it means it can rely on the accessibile components of the rest of the network for those able (when they are working).
 
you can't even get to a medical appointment on time using wheeltrans. the TTC needs serious cash. 3.2 billion surplus anyone?
 
If George Bush's cold heartless USA can have 80% paratransit funding and a national transit strategy, and we don't have either (the only one of the G8 which doesn't), shouldn't we be asking our MPs to do something about that?
 
If George Bush's cold heartless USA can have 80% paratransit funding and a national transit strategy, and we don't have either (the only one of the G8 which doesn't), shouldn't we be asking our MPs to do something about that?

do you have any literature on that i can read?
 
The sooner we replace WheelTrans with a fully accessible transit system the better, both from cost and service standpoints. The biggest problem I see is the TTC's incredibly lackadaisical approach to maintaining the accessibility infrastructure. When elevators go out of service, it can take months for the TTC to fix them. The one at St. George comes to mind. This is beyond absurd. If the elevator in my building failed for even a day, there would be hell to pay. Why can't the TTC just hire the same people to maintain its elevators that thousands of businesses across the city use?
 
Wheel-Trans will still be there, but hopefully it will only have to be used by those unable to get to the accessible bus stop, so it would be smaller, but it can not be replaced entirely, not in the short-to-medium term at least.

The TTC needs to fix its elevator issues, and this is one of few areas where contacting out makes oh so much sense. Also, some redundancy needs to be built into the system - the key stations, like St. George, should have two elevators.
 
prometheus - sorry about that.

http://www.iatransit.com/office/assistance.asp

Section 5307 “Urbanized Area Formula Program†- These funds come to the state on the basis of population and population densities in urbanized areas with populations between 50,000 and 200,000 to support public transit activities. They go directly to areas over 200,000 population. Transit systems may use up to 10 percent of these funds to pay for some of their ADA paratransit costs on an 80 percent federal-20 percent non-federal basis. In urbanized areas with populations greater than 200,000, at least 1 percent of these funds must be set aside for transit enhancement activities. In areas under 200,000 population the funding can be used to support operating deficit. Funds used in this manner must be matched by non-federal funds (other than passenger revenues) on a dollar-for-dollar basis. The remainder can be used to fund capital improvements (including preventative maintenance activities) or planning activities on an 80 percent federal-20 percent non-federal basis. (Purchase of vehicles equipped for access by persons with disabilities can be funded at 83 percent federal participation, and purchase of special equipment required under the Clean Air Act Amendments can be funded at 90 percent federal participation.)
 
I'm curious to know, what is the history of WheelTrans. Was there a lawsuit or something years ago demanding that the city pay to transport those who can't use the regular system? The city doesn't IIRC cover transport for blind folks, so why for folks in wheel chairs or the elderly, but I might be entirely wrong.

Not that I'm advocating it whatsoever, as we all may need the service in our lifetime, and instead should be improving it quickly out of respect of all our citizens, but what's to stop the TTC or City from just cancelling WheelTrans altogether?
 
I'm curious to know, what is the history of WheelTrans. Was there a lawsuit or something years ago demanding that the city pay to transport those who can't use the regular system? The city doesn't IIRC cover transport for blind folks, so why for folks in wheel chairs or the elderly, but I might be entirely wrong.

Not that I'm advocating it whatsoever, as we all may need the service in our lifetime, and instead should be improving it quickly out of respect of all our citizens, but what's to stop the TTC or City from just cancelling WheelTrans altogether?


wheeltrans if for anyone with any disability. deaf, blind, weak, paralyzed, cognitive problems, etc.

wheeltrans used to be called toronto paratransit, funded by the government but privatly run, but then the government forced the ttc to take it over due to corruption.


what's to stop the TTC from canceling wheeltrans? IMO, a public relations disaster & denying the disabled access to transit while they pay taxes (past, present and future) for transit is theft.
 

Back
Top