News   Apr 01, 2026
 283     0 
News   Apr 01, 2026
 339     0 
News   Apr 01, 2026
 523     1 

VIA Rail

A just-published post (perhaps more for the Legal Eagles than the Rail Fans) on various pre-hearing examinations, including interrogation of VIA's Mario Peloquin.

This lay person certainly wonders what any of this gamesmanship has to do with the core issue of railway trains and crossing protection and signalling.

I'm sure that all this to'ing and fro'ing makes sense to the lawyers..... one can't help but notice how much they earn by embellishing the arguments.

One wonders whether the court will be able to discern "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" when most of the relevant data is shielded by some form of privilege.

- Paul
 
One wonders whether the court will be able to discern "the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth" when most of the relevant data is shielded by some form of privilege.
Agreed. So far, the judges have become remarkably conversant in the subject matter per their written judgments. Wouldn't it have been optimal if the discussions had involved Transport Canada, VIA and CN. At one point in his judgment, the judge suggests TC should join the discussion. TC's request for data from CN was fulfilled in its first tranche - now a year ago! Though the speed tables and permanent slow orders are being lauded as a game-changer, OTP data shows that there are still consistent delays for Venture-equipped trains.
 
Agreed. So far, the judges have become remarkably conversant in the subject matter per their written judgments. Wouldn't it have been optimal if the discussions had involved Transport Canada, VIA and CN. At one point in his judgment, the judge suggests TC should join the discussion. TC's request for data from CN was fulfilled in its first tranche - now a year ago! Though the speed tables and permanent slow orders are being lauded as a game-changer, OTP data shows that there are still consistent delays for Venture-equipped trains.

With the full fleet more or less in service, I wonder what the data would show about the number of "failure to activate" events over the last six months. Has there actually been a bogeyman?

The speed restrictions are about ensuring safe braking if the gates are observed to have not activated, rather than making the shunt more effective.

The data would only be getting more reliable by each passing day.

- Paul
 
With the full fleet more or less in service, I wonder what the data would show about the number of "failure to activate" events over the last six months. Has there actually been a bogeyman?

The speed restrictions are about ensuring safe braking if the gates are observed to have not activated, rather than making the shunt more effective.

The data would only be getting more reliable by each passing day.

- Paul
Yes, VIA has said that the longer this goes without a bogeyman/smoking gun of CN data, the better the data gets. At the same time, the government has included funding for shunt-enhancers in its most recent budget, though development/implementation/testing will take time. CN's case is built on 'safety first' not 'we've got data'.

FYI here are my most recent data on how many Venture sets are observed in service on a weekly basis (denoted by Venture Set # at left, dates at top and 'V' = observed in service). Set 1 does not leave TMC.
Screenshot 2026-01-19 at 11.54.36.png
Screenshot 2026-01-19 at 11.55.15.jpeg
Screenshot 2026-01-19 at 11.55.29.png
 
With the full fleet more or less in service, I wonder what the data would show about the number of "failure to activate" events over the last six months. Has there actually been a bogeyman?

The speed restrictions are about ensuring safe braking if the gates are observed to have not activated, rather than making the shunt more effective.

The data would only be getting more reliable by each passing day.

- Paul
I have been driving for over 20 years and have never needed my seat belt to hold me back. Other drivers likely have been driving even longer and likely have the same result.Does that mean we should remove them?

They say the rules in the operating manuals are written in blood. Do we want an accident to prove CN right? Do we want to risk whether they are wrong? I may not agree wit the slow order, but I understand why lack of proof won't be proof, but could be proof. Imagine if tomorrow the courts ruled in Via's favour and a week later a crossing signal doesn't operate and an accident happens. What then?
 
I have been driving for over 20 years and have never needed my seat belt to hold me back. Other drivers likely have been driving even longer and likely have the same result.Does that mean we should remove them?

They say the rules in the operating manuals are written in blood. Do we want an accident to prove CN right? Do we want to risk whether they are wrong? I may not agree wit the slow order, but I understand why lack of proof won't be proof, but could be proof. Imagine if tomorrow the courts ruled in Via's favour and a week later a crossing signal doesn't operate and an accident happens. What then?
Maybe we should stop the Ventures at every road crossing. That would be the safest! The facts are that these crossings function in the Corridor thousands of times every day. Where is CN's best proof that there is a problem? No, no, maybe we should give vehicles priority and only let the trains cross the crossings when there are no cars coming!!

The court cases have been in the works for over a year. Surely some time in those intervening months there would have been some close calls. Someone would go to the media and say their car almost got hit after being on the crossing in front of a Venture for two seconds. The burden of proof is not on CN, as they are the 'infrastructure owner' and dictate to VIA through a train service agreement that is still up in the air. VIA is the tenant but still has recourse. Stay tuned for Quebec Superior Court in January. February?
 
Maybe we should stop the Ventures at every road crossing. That would be the safest! The facts are that these crossings function in the Corridor thousands of times every day. Where is CN's best proof that there is a problem? No, no, maybe we should give vehicles priority and only let the trains cross the crossings when there are no cars coming!!

The court cases have been in the works for over a year. Surely some time in those intervening months there would have been some close calls. Someone would go to the media and say their car almost got hit after being on the crossing in front of a Venture for two seconds. The burden of proof is not on CN, as they are the 'infrastructure owner' and dictate to VIA through a train service agreement that is still up in the air. VIA is the tenant but still has recourse. Stay tuned for Quebec Superior Court in January. February?
There is extreme and then there is reasonable. You suggest an extreme. And you are right, the court could side with Via. It would be interesting though to see the evidence that CN is basing this on.
 
There is extreme and then there is reasonable. You suggest an extreme...I have been driving for over 20 years and have never needed my seat belt to hold me back. Other drivers
likely have been driving even longer and likely have the same result.Does that mean we should remove them?
Sorry, meeting extreme with extreme.
It would be interesting though to see the evidence that CN is basing this on.

Oh boy. Ain't we all. One suspicious train-car collision in the US, a few short warning times on the CN Drummondville Sub, paranoia, CYA and risk-aversion. That ain't safety, it's over-reaction. Mixed with a healthy dose of VIAntagonism on CN's behalf.
 
Translated text below. I don't think this article has been posted yet.


By Olivier Faucher

Friday, January 23, 2026

VIA Rail’s new Siemens trains, purchased for nearly $1 billion, are already experiencing technical problems during winter, leading to recurring breakdowns and forcing the Crown corporation to rely on older locomotives as backup.

In 2018, VIA Rail awarded a $989-million contract to Siemens to build 32 new train sets in California. These “Venture” model trains have been in service since 2022, replacing the aging fleet on the Quebec City–Windsor corridor. The final train set was delivered just a few months ago.

However, Le Journal has learned that winter-related technical problems have recently prompted VIA Rail to implement several mitigation measures.

Winter-Related Failures

The Teamsters union, which represents locomotive engineers, believes snow infiltration or cold weather is affecting certain components, causing breakdowns without warning.

“When that happens, the heating and USB ports fail. The lights remain on temporarily via battery. The train begins to slow down and operators can bring it to a controlled stop to restart the power supply,” explained Teamsters spokesperson Christopher Monette.

These failures reportedly occur “several times a month” and are often resolved quickly by staff restarting the train to avoid major disruptions.
“But sometimes they aren’t able to,” Monette added.

A notable incident occurred in Brockville, Ontario, on December 10 and 11, when approximately 300 passengers were stranded for more than 12 hours on a Siemens train traveling from Toronto to Ottawa.

“The trains operate perfectly in the summer. It’s only in the winter that we see problems, and that creates growing concern among our members. They start their shifts wondering if the train will run,” Monette said.

“This is not normal.”

Old Locomotives as Backup

Following the Brockville incident, VIA Rail began coupling older locomotives to the new Siemens trains as a precautionary measure. This practice continued until last week.

The Journal also learned that VIA Rail may soon limit use of the new trains to one direction only, despite their intended bi-directional operation.

“The train is supposed to be able to push and pull. It’s like a mechanic telling you: ‘There’s a problem with your car and we don’t understand it, so don’t use reverse.’ That’s not normal,” Monette said.
He warned that this could complicate train movements and increase congestion on rail networks.

Manufacturer and VIA Rail Responses
VIA Rail spokesperson Karl Helou stated only that the company is conducting “thorough technical investigations” with Siemens into the December breakdowns and has received “preliminary results,” without further detail.

Monette believes Siemens owes the public clearer explanations.

“These are brand new trains, paid for by taxpayers. It’s up to the manufacturer to fix these problems,” he said.

Siemens trains of the Venture model are widely used in the United States, including in the Midwest, Florida, and New York State.

Monette also criticized the original procurement decision:

“We can only regret that in 2018 the government awarded the contract to Siemens in California when Bombardier was right here in La Pocatière. They understand our winters better.”

Maintenance Costs and Siemens’ Position
In addition to the purchase price, VIA Rail pays Siemens $23.7 million annually over 15 years for maintenance and replacement parts.

In a written response, Siemens said its trains are “guaranteed in the long term.”

“Our locomotives are designed by our engineers to operate optimally and reliably throughout the year,” said spokesperson Vanessa Bergeron.

Other Ongoing Issues

Siemens’ Venture trains are also at the center of a dispute between VIA Rail and CN Rail. CN argues the trains lack sufficient axles to automatically trigger level-crossing barriers, requiring VIA trains to slow down at crossings since October 2025.

This legal conflict has caused major delays on the Quebec City–Windsor corridor and forced VIA Rail to issue more than $31 million in travel credits to passengers, according to Radio-Canada.
 
Translated text below. I don't think this article has been posted yet.


By Olivier Faucher

Friday, January 23, 2026

VIA Rail’s new Siemens trains, purchased for nearly $1 billion, are already experiencing technical problems during winter, leading to recurring breakdowns and forcing the Crown corporation to rely on older locomotives as backup.
Minor points - the CN crossing supplement was put in effect October, 2024 not October, 2025 as stated in the article. It also doesn't make clear that only Venture trains need to adhere to the crossing speed reductions.
 
“We can only regret that in 2018 the government awarded the contract to Siemens in California when Bombardier was right here in La Pocatière. They understand our winters better.”
Not taking away from the problems the Siemens equipment is having, I'm wondering what non-commuter product Bombardier (back then) had that was ready to go in 2018, not to mention BBD didn't manufacture motive power.
 
Sorry, meeting extreme with extreme.


Oh boy. Ain't we all. One suspicious train-car collision in the US, a few short warning times on the CN Drummondville Sub, paranoia, CYA and risk-aversion. That ain't safety, it's over-reaction. Mixed with a healthy dose of VIAntagonism on CN's behalf.
My hope is that whatever the ruling is, it is sound and based on factual and verifiable information. I do not fully understand the fixes, but waiting for an accident to happen would be horrible. If there is something CN can do that is of low cost to rectify the problem then they should do it. I still feel Via should have gotten CN's expressed acknowledgement that the equipment they are building, in the set up they want would work on their lines. That should be a key document in this case.
 
I still feel Via should have gotten CN's expressed acknowledgement that the equipment they are building, in the set up they want would work on their lines. That should be a key document in this case.
Some key dates and communication:
October 15, 2021 - CN's Manager of Signals emails VIA: “CN will authorize the use of the new 24-axle train sets on its routes. A ten-day notification to CN is required before placing these train sets in revenue service on any CN route. CN reserves the right to place any restriction it deems necessary should shunting problems occur.”

December 3, 2021 - CN issues Operating Bulletin 638 allowing VIA Venture equipment to operate LRC NB speeds on the Kingston Subdivision.
July 25, 2022 - VIA emails CN: "We are planning on operating to Oshawa on July 27 and to Toronto on August 4 and August 9. Could you please ensure that the bulletin enclosed includes the whole Kingston Sub, we are missing the Great Lakes portion? To our knowledge, “we have no outstanding open topic with regards to the authorization of the new Fleet with CN. Can we get LRC NB authorization for all Corridor? If not, which info is missing?” [Here's Set 1 returning from SW Ontario through Kingston on August 6.]

July 27, 2022 - VIA emails CN: “Since it is our understanding that the CN technical review is completed, and to avoid this situation in the future, could we get a written confirmation by CN that the Host Railway Package submitted by VIA to CN has been reviewed and deem complete, and that CN has no further questions". CN responds that “Engineering will be the ones to sign off. The bulletin confirms your movement also."

October 24, 2022 - VIA emails CN: “VIA Rail is planning to start passenger service with the Venture Fleet on November 8th, 2022. Daily Consists issued by VIA’s Operations Control Centre were accessible by CN showing which VIA equipment was operating on each train. VIA claims this transparency was provided to CN in real-time. On the same day, CN's Manager of Signals - Engineering sent an email to VIA's Project Director for the Rolling Stock Acquisition, part of the Corridor Fleet Renewal Program (New Fleet), asking which Venture configuration VIA would be putting into service. The response was, "Same configuration we have been testing, Long Trainset: Loco + 4 coaches + cab car. We will not change it until we test shorter consist and agree with CN on the path forward."
 

Back
Top