Urban Sky
Senior Member
There are lots of examples of Amtrak providing commuter service in the US. How does that get funded?
Almost by definition, Amtrak doesn’t operate commuter rail services, as it is America’s largest intercity rail provider (by a wide margin). The structuring of its three mandates is not that different from VIA’s, with its operations in the Norteast Corridor being self-sufficient and with the rest of its network being splitbetween State-supported and longhaul routes. The crucial difference is that Amtrak’s non-Corridor routes are split by their length, with every route exceeding 750 miles (1207 km) being a federally-funded “Long-Distance Route”, whereas everything shorter counts as a “State-Supported Route. Conversely, in VIA’s network, non-Corridor routes are only distinguished by whether they link Halifax or Vancouver with the rest of the country (“longhaul”) or remote communities (“regional” or “remote” services).
Conversely, commuter rail networks are generally operated by State or Metropolitan agencies with funding from federal, State and local taxpayers:
Source: AAR
What would such an arrangement mean for Canada? VIA’s Corridor services would operate as they do, but with a slightly stronger focus on reinvesting the operational surplus (direct revenues covered more than 130% of direct operating costs pre-pandemic) in improved service levels. As for the non-Corridor routes, federal taxpayers would only fund the operation of the Canadian (4466 km), Ocean (1356 km) and Winnipeg-Churchill (1697 km), whereas MTRL-HERV-JONQ/SENN (510/717 km), SUDB-WHTR (484 km) and JASP-PHEO-PRUP (1160 km) would be funded by the taxpayers of Quebec (same applies to the 1057 km long MTRL-MTPD-GASP service, if it ever gets reinstated), Ontario and Alberta&BC, respectively. GO, exo and West Coast Express would still fall in the “Commuter Rail” category, but now co-funded by federal and not just provincial and municipal taxpayers…




