This
LA Times article about cutbacks to California’s HSR project isn’t good news for the rest of us.
The actual degree of cutback is not yet clear, with some people saying the project is still moving ahead in some aspects and others saying it’s dead. It sounds like they will complete some sections of the line, but not attempt a full San Francisco- LA high speed route.
It doesn’t directly compare to VIA’s much more modest proposal, but It does open the door for every HxR critic everywhere to say “I told ya so”, and public perceptions of HxR will be impacted accordingly. That won’t help VIA any.
This particular project may have been a tad overoptimistic, with politics perhaps glossing over some of the risks and pitfalls. (I can’t imagine how one could understate the difficulty of building a new rail line into the Los Angeles area. If the “easy” parts of the route got into trouble, that segment remains a very tricky and pricey proposition.) One would hope that VIA is doing its homework carefully on the costs and underlying technical issues, as well as planning its governance and oversight so that contractors are held in check.
I was cautiously optimistic that the Liberals would trot out VIA’s HFR proposal as a pre-election bauble. That may now backfire - the Liberal ‘brand’ may not survive the election. If the Liberals attach themselves too much to HFR, it could be discarded by a Tory government for that very reason.
Anyways, while California is a long way away, and while their project is nothing like what VIA contemplates, in the public’s eye they are pretty much the same.
- Paul