adma
Superstar
Yes, unless you feel that faculties of architecture don't count as "homegrown" anything...
Yes, unless you feel that faculties of architecture don't count as "homegrown" anything...
I think it's a foreign grown event being paired with an architecture faculty (a good one, but not...the best one?)
Actually, Waterloo's architectural faculty has had a genuinely excellent reputation for eons now, so for them to score a Biennale coup shouldn't seem at all "unworthy"--and plenty of experts in the field would vouch for that.
You make it seem like it's little better than a backwater state-college drafting school--either that, or you're using an absurd amateur's Harvard/Yale/Princeton standard of "best one" judgment...
Waterloo is one of the top schols* in Canada for CompSci, Engineering, Kin, Math, and Psych (esp. clinical), physics (quantum and astro) and isn't lacking too much in the planning department either (tho the campus could use some more). Add the fact they have the only english optometry school, and are going to have one of the few pharmacy schools in the country, and you've got yourself a fairly decent school. The other arts and sciences aren't too shabby either, but when you compare them to the kind of faculty and opporuinities that cultural centres like TO and Montreal offer, and it doesn't always compare as well. I've think Waterloo brought itself up fairly well in the rankings for being comparativly young compared to a lot of the other big name universities in the country.But it is a backwater state-college, in a sense (at least compared to the other Ontario universities; UofT, Western). It just happens to have one of the top architecture programmes in the country. I didn't think it was quite #1 though.
If anything's "backwater state-college", it's your sense of judgment...
(quickly, because I'm rushing to work)
But does Toronto really need it? It's a great cultural activity, but would it really be appreciated here as much as it would in Cambridge where the pavillion renovations would help revitalize the downtowns, which is one area the city isn't lacking in?Lame. Don't forget you're mildly arguing that Cambridge is a more appropriate place for the Venice Architecture Biennale than Toronto. Whether you're arguing the point just to be contrary, or whether you firmly believe it...I'm really not sure.
But does Toronto really need it? It's a great cultural activity, but would it really be appreciated here as much as it would in Cambridge where the pavillion renovations would help revitalize the downtowns, which is one area the city isn't lacking in?
But the Bienniale never was in the "main" cultural heartland to begin with. Venice is probably third in the pecking order of cultural centres of Italy, after Rome and Florence, and likely ahead of Milan and Turin (I've never been to those two though). It's more fitting for it to be in a somewhat less "traditional" centre, seeing as that's where it's origin trace back too (though in no way am I trying to say Cambridge is on-par with Venice).Need it? no. But is that any reason for it not to be hosted here? I think we're too nice, sometimes, with how we distribute things in the region. Its great that we like to share, but I think we go too far sometimes in not demanding our dues. I think we're missing a prime tourism opportunity that Cambridge won't be able to capitalize as fully on.
Bingo.Besides, artists and designers have been living and working in rural Ontario forever.
But the Bienniale never was in the "main" cultural heartland to begin with. Venice is probably third in the pecking order of cultural centres of Italy, after Rome and Florence, and likely ahead of Milan and Turin (I've never been to those two though). It's more fitting for it to be in a somewhat less "traditional" centre, seeing as that's where it's origin trace back too (though in no way am I trying to say Cambridge is on-par with Venice).
Lame. Don't forget you're mildly arguing that Cambridge is a more appropriate place for the Venice Architecture Biennale than Toronto. Whether you're arguing the point just to be contrary, or whether you firmly believe it...I'm really not sure.
If anything, TKTKTK, your amateurish arguments are just the kind of thing to scare the Biennale's organizers away from Toronto...




