News   May 22, 2024
 809     1 
News   May 22, 2024
 638     1 
News   May 22, 2024
 459     0 

Vaughan Civic Centre (Maple, 4s, KPMB)

A

AlvinofDiaspar

Guest
By R Ouellette, taken from Reading Toronto, cross published in the Post:

2006 07 01
The New Suburbia
Are the suburbs on the verge of becoming urban destinations?

With Toronto’s waterfront and the Four Seasons Centre for the Performing Arts attracting much deserved media attention, changes taking place at the edge of the city have escaped unnoticed. That is too bad because the City of Vaughan may be about to challenge the way we think about suburbs by creating a civic space as engaging as any found in Toronto.

For years, Toronto residents watched awestruck as small towns north of the city sprawled their way into full-fledged cities. Vaughan is an example. About 29,000 people lived there in 1981. By 2001, that number grew to 185,000. With growth that fast, there is little time for attention to details – build one street, move on to the next and add a strip mall destination for cars on the corner – fast.

The result is, of course, that many of these suburban cities lack the considered civic and urban amenities that provide older cities a sense of place and community. Cars are king. Do you ever wonder why some 20,000 suburban kids flood into downtown Toronto on Saturday nights? This might just be one of the reasons: they hunger for a sense of cultural identity.

Bucking the trend, politicians in Vaughan wanted a civic centre to focus their community’s unique identity in a distinctly urban way.

They held a design competition. Toronto’s KPMB Architects won by re-imagining what a suburban city centre could look like. Here is how they did it and why Torontonians might soon be going north for a unique urban experience.

Rather than design a tall office tower surrounded by a sea of asphalt, they decided, as project architect Bruce Kuwabara insists, “to create a place of enhanced urban and public life.†They also wanted to celebrate the rolling farmlands that are an integral part of the city’s history.

The program requirements challenged those goals. For example, the city needed parking for 900 cars on its 24-acre site. As a result, early schemes looked like a suburban mall no matter how designers arranged the required elements.

They kept at it.

“We can’t recreate a Tuscany in Vaughan but we can make a place that is so inviting people get out of their cars and walk . . . where we cultivate a civic landscape,†says Kuwabara.

The firm has what some might describe as a European sensitivity to both environmental issues and to a lively public realm. In modern building, sustainability is a given. But KPMB demands more. LEEDs environmental certification, they insist, must work hand-in-glove with the broader cultural and civic issues that breath public life into a place.

In this case, by making the Centre a campus-like cluster of four discrete buildings – a Council Chamber here, a library building there – they put a large number of those parking spots below a “green†public amenity. The parking garage roof becomes an ice rink in winter and a water feature with its own island in summer.

Working with landscape architects Philips Farvaag Smallenberg, the designers also thought of a striking way to acknowledge Vaughan’s agricultural heritage. They wove the campus buildings into an east-west pattern of lots using the Province’s concession grid as a baseline. Visualize striped fields on rolling Southern Ontario hills and you have the basis for their inspiration.

The field metaphor, it turns out, is a good way to organize the terra cotta, copper, and glass clad buildings. A linear atrium space provides natural light and through-ventilation to each. The linear module also means that the buildings are flexible enough to change its use as required over time.

In the competition models, the overall effect of these design choices is to create a low cluster of buildings somewhat reminiscent in scale and texture to Frank Lloyd Wright’s Prairie Style architecture. Their shapes compliment the landscape but they also create undeniably effective urban spaces.

This strategy allows for other civic uses of the Centre. “We have this idea of a farmers’market on the site clustered around an allee of trees that will transverse the property,†says Kuwabara. That market will be another reason for Vaughan residents – and even Torontonians – to come to the Centre and abandon their cars.
This story is also published in today's National Post
_________________________________________________

I am not convinced that architecture alone can draw people in for all but the most exceptional cases. Toronto City Hall/NPS isn't busy and interesting just because of its' architecture, but how NPS fits into the surrounding urban fabric and the general psyche of the big city around it.

The context within which VCC sits in doesn't comes close to offering such sense of place.

AoD
 
Alvin, I tend to agree. It's interesting that they chose to build at the current site up in Maple rather trying to integrate it into their much-talked-about "Corporate Centre". On the positive side, it's at least one step toward "urbanity" in a municipality which probably more than any other in the GTA has pretty much ignored any such sensibilities until now.
 
Though remember that it's pretty much the old centre of Maple, i.e. small-town Ontario at heart, despite the gird of sprawl.

Still, Maple ain't Unionville.
 
They located the new civic centre in the wrong place and nothing is going to save it from the fact that there will not be enough attractions in the immediate area to draw people out of their cars to walk around. There are single detached homes all around the site and the area zoned for more intense use is at Highway 7 and Jane.
 
If Vaughan want people to get out of their cars and walk to the civic centre, just put it smack in the middle of Canada's Wonderland!

It's quite obvious that the new Vaughan Civic Centre is nothing but a prestige project for the city. Bring in a big name Canadian architect. Get a design that incorporates all the latest trends in Toronto architecture these days- sleek modern design, LEED, pedestrian-friendliness, etc.- things that Vaughan might not even believe in. Voila, you've got a building that will make people in the architectural community talk about Vaughan- more publicity and attention for the "city above Toronto".
 
Some of you are going to be in big trouble for misspelling Vaughan.


It is fascinating how the suburbs, where there was once so much emphasis on being anti-city, now have councils that strive to emulate elements of the city.
 
Vaughan? Urban? I'll be deep in my cold cold grave before that happens.

And if Alvin spells it Vaughn one more time, his moderatorship will be revoked.
 
Make him say U.N.C.L.E.
Vaughn3.jpg
 
Anyway, I guess this feeds the "suburbanism" argument, but the design pretty well reads as a tribute to the postwar International Style "civic centre" type (a la Etobicoke, et al)
RT-kpmbvaughan.jpg
 
It does have a bit of an Etobicoke Civic Centre feel to it now that you mention it. Well, at least with that towery-thing like the clock tower at ECC.
 
Vaughan OKs civic centre project

Star

Link to article

Vaughan okays city hall bid


New mayor is lone dissenter, accusing city manager of rushing $107M project
December 19, 2006
Peter Edwards
Staff Reporter

Vaughan's new mayor cast the sole dissenting vote against the largest public contract in the city's history yesterday, accusing the city manager of rushing the $107 million project.

At a packed and often stormy council meeting, Mayor Linda Jackson said she's not against building a new city hall and civic centre.

"I felt the process was not followed," she said shortly before council voted 8-1 toward awarding the contract to low-bidder Maystar General Contractors.

"I feel that we have not gone through a proper consultation," Jackson told council.

The vote was Jackson's first major test since her narrow victory on Nov. 13 over incumbent Michael Di Biase, and it pitted her directly against city manager Michael DeAngelis.

Regional Councillor Joyce Frustaglio, who chaired the meeting, enthusiastically recommended awarding the contract to Maystar immediately, and told dissenters they don't have to continue living in Vaughan if they aren't happy with the decision.

"If you are not proud to be part of this city, there are plenty of other cities in the province of Ontario," Frustaglio told critics, who packed council chambers for the afternoon meeting.

Jackson and Frustaglio were the only people on council to ask questions of the city committee that recommended awarding the contract to Maystar.

Regional Councillor Mario Ferri said he's satisfied the public had plenty of chances to participate in the project.

"While this (process) isn't perfect, it's pretty damn close," he said.

The new city hall-civic centre will be named after Jackson's mother, the late Lorna Jackson, a former Vaughan mayor.

The mayor had particularly sharp words for DeAngelis, who had originally told council the vote on the project would be held in late January, after councillors had time to study a recommendation drafted by DeAngelis, three city staff and consulting architect Peter Berton.

Their report, which was passed yesterday by council, raised the project's budget from $93.6 million to $107 million.

Jackson pointedly asked DeAngelis why he didn't bother to call her last Wednesday afternoon, when he scheduled yesterday's special meeting.

He had earlier emailed councillors to suggest the meeting would be held in late January.

"I had no knowledge," Jackson said. "I'm the mayor of the municipality.... Why wasn't I informed?"

She also criticized him for holding an afternoon meeting, when it was inconvenient for many members of the public.

DeAngelis said he thought council was aware of the possibility that the meeting might be moved ahead, and added he wanted to find a date when the city's "fairness monitor," former Supreme Court justice Peter Cory, was available.

A member of the public gallery asked if former mayor Di Biase was at city hall last Wednesday, pushing for a quick vote on the project.

Frustaglio dismissed the question as improper, and said Di Biase was likely at city hall to clean out his office.

For his part, Cory told the meeting that it was the first time he had been involved in monitoring the fairness of a bidding competition.

However, he said his experience as a judge essentially centred around fairness.

Cory said he was not part of drafting the document that determined which contractors were qualified to bid for the massive project, but he added he was satisfied the project went to the lowest bidder.

"I can only go on the basis of the tender," he said. Maystar "met the criteria."

Maystar was the lowest bidder at $84.3 million, followed by Vanbots Construction Corp. at $90 million and Eastern Construction Ltd. at $108 million.

Frustaglio ordered a security guard to eject critic Paul De Buono from the meeting, after he shouted from the public gallery that she had yet to answer numerous questions he has about the awarding of the contract.

De Buono said he has taken a considerable amount of heat for his criticism on his Vaughan Watch website for how the contract was awarded.

"I have personally experienced lobbying to a point that I felt very uncomfortable," he said, before being ejected.

"The person responsible for this lobbying is an Ontario Liberal MPP."

He did not identify the MPP.

Berton praised the project as one that will give city residents a strong return on their investment, both in quality of life and in durability and energy efficiency.

Some members of the public supported moving the project along, without further questions.

"Let's build our city a decent house," one resident urged.

Yesterday marked the fourth time that Maystar and its affiliate, Kapp Contracting Inc., both based in Vaughan, beat out competitors for city contracts.

Before winning this project, Maystar had been awarded contracts worth a total of $50 million.
 
Louroz, no squabbling amongst the burbs here, for who will rise to defend Vaughan?
 

Back
Top