JasonParis
Moderator
Wasn't expecting the Hammy Hamster reference. lol
Is it?It’s not about solving homelessness and addictions, but keeping them off the TTC.
How do you propose we do this? Have everyone file on through one door on the Flexity streetcars? We might as well pack up the transit system at that point, since it would be faster to walk.POP needs to be reversed.
The TTC is a city agency, and its the city's responsibility. It's literally the same people calling the shots. To say otherwise is ignoring the problem.IBecause it’s not within the TTC’s responsibility or ability to solve society’s ills. Instead the TTC needs to recognize and work within the society it finds itself. This is a city with an issue with homelessness, addiction and mental illness, same as every major city in North America.
If relatively sober and non-violent, I don't see a big issue with this. But I think a complaint to TTC and the councillor is in order.I was at King Station the other day when a homeless person pushed through the barriers. A station attendant ran after him and said, “Next time, just tell me first and I’ll open it.” I get the intent, but this clearly isn’t a sustainable solution—and it’s a reminder of why fare inspections are needed system-wide.
Seeing homeless people outside at a park or on the street is not the same as being stuck on a train with them when the doors close. That's the difference.Is it?
How are things better if you encounter these problems outside of the TTC? Is it okay if you see someone strung out on drugs in a park, or a coffee shop, or a library?




