innsertnamehere
Superstar
But look at the new coca cola headquarters! There's an example of a location that got a lease, and is much closer to this site than queen richmond center.
Not to pop your bubble but the KE Centre - the office tower on King - looks fairly certain to go ahead as the developers (Great Gulf and First Gulf) intend to occupy a large part of it themelves.The second tower - Front and Berkeley - is 100% residential and the third tower (Princess and Front) is not planned for any time soon. That's not to say that office buildings on QQE will succeed in finding tenants but having an LRT to link the area to the subway would certainly help.Again I'm not saying there isn't demand, just that its very limited, lets see if the 500,000 square foot King East center ever gets off the ground.
Not to pop your bubble but the KE Centre - the office tower on King - looks fairly certain to go ahead as the developers (Great Gulf and First Gulf) intend to occupy a large part of it themelves.The second tower - Front and Berkeley - is 100% residential and the third tower (Princess and Front) is not planned for any time soon. That's not to say that office buildings on QQE will succeed in finding tenants but having an LRT to link the area to the subway would certainly help.
I haven't heard one peep regarding this and I follow quite a few folks in the commercial real estate business.Not to pop your bubble but the KE Centre - the office tower on King - looks fairly certain to go ahead as the developers (Great Gulf and First Gulf) intend to occupy a large part of it themelves.
Lets step back, how does a streetcar provide more capacity in the short term compared to a brt ? Even given East Bay front fully built out ... I doubt there would be anywhere near the hypothetical demand you must be projecting !
And yet in rush-hour, it's normally quicker to walk from Queens Quay to Union.The big advantage of a streetcar is that it can use the tunnel into Union.
And yet in rush-hour, it's normally quicker to walk from Queens Quay to Union.
The time you spend parked in the tunnel, waiting to get onto the platform. Now, if they triple the platform space ... and quadruple the number of lines running in (Bremner, Lakeshore West, Lakeshore East ... then it will still be faster to walk.What makes the trip through the tunnel slow in rush hour? I'm only there off-peak, when it's a very fast run -- much faster than walking.
But in this case, capacity isn't even the main factor. BRT would probably be fine for the demand on Queen's Quay East, but the problem is that there's no reliable way for the buses to get from Queen's Quay to Union Station -- Bay and Front are both clogged with traffic and have no space for any form of transit priority. The big advantage of a streetcar is that it can use the tunnel into Union.
Taking the streetcar from Queens Quay is faster than walking? Perhaps if you were already on a streetcar, it might work ... but it seems faster to walk from Queens Quay to me, than to go down into the station and wait for a streetcar, that then waits in the tunnel to get to Union.Having taken the 509/510 to Union every weekday for the past two years, I can say that is not true. Walking has never been faster than the streetcar.
Taking the streetcar from Queens Quay is faster than walking? Perhaps if you were already on a streetcar, it might work ... but it seems faster to walk from Queens Quay to me, than to go down into the station and wait for a streetcar, that then waits in the tunnel to get to Union.
Never used it in morning rush. I'm there in the afternoons, evenings, or weekends.Waiting for the lights at Lakeshore then Harbour alone take longer than the time the streetcar waits in the tunnel. I've never waited more than a few seconds for the streetcar ahead to pull forward. In the afternoon its a completely different story, but things flow pretty well during the morning rush from my experience.