News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto Year-End Poll: Vote on the Best Buildings of 2024, presented by Sapphire Balconies
 2.5K     8 
News   Dec 20, 2024
UrbanToronto's Social Media Presence Skyrocketed in 2024
 1K     2 
News   Dec 20, 2024
Mattamy Homes Records A Year of Accomplishments
 1.9K     0 

TTC: Other Items (catch all)

drum118 said:
The proposed plan was have an ROW on the west side of Bathurst from Fort York to QQ with a new connection to Fleet to remove traffic from the picture as well having real platforms and shelters on Fleet/

The same would apply to QQW that is currently a centre ROW.
Click to expand...
I think these were seen as separate projects with the work on Bathurst/Fleet to be done when the tracks there needed to be replaced (now??) and the ROW on QQE moving to the side of the street between Spadina and Bathurst at some point when someone has lots of $$$ as THAT is a far bigger project.
 
DSC said:
I think these were seen as separate projects with the work on Bathurst/Fleet to be done when the tracks there needed to be replaced (now??) and the ROW on QQE moving to the side of the street between Spadina and Bathurst at some point when someone has lots of $$$ as THAT is a far bigger project.
Click to expand...
The plan to redo QQ been on the books since 2008 or about with the Fleet intersection from QQ to Fort York since 2019 or about if it is on the books.

If you are going to move the ROW to the west side of Bathurst to deal with Fleet intersection, you need to deal with the current ROW from the Lake Shore to QQ at the same time as the alignment will be mismatch at Fleet. To do it right, Lake Shore would have to be done twice if the northern section is done first.

Since there been no EA for moving the ROW, the work will be replacing what is there now for the Fleet intersection with traffic still interfering with the turning of the 511.
 
Last edited:
This is probably the first time for a 504 on the restored tracks.

1732433511245.png


I guess Adelaide isn't ready yet west of York?
 
Without opining on the merits of particular individuals, the TTC is a massive city agency and a massive transit agency which deserves the best available leadership, wherever it comes from. It should have transit leaders from all over the world fighting to lead it, and not merely the ones looking to pad their pension pots after mediocre stints elsewhere. If this job can’t attract that kind of leader, we need to look seriously at why, whether it is the compensation, the governance environment or anything else which is causing that, and not just for positions at CEO level either.
 
Jonny5 said:
This is probably the first time for a 504 on the restored tracks.

View attachment 614430

I guess Adelaide isn't ready yet west of York?
Click to expand...
DSC said:
Or the staff at TTC who set up detours have not yet found out about it? It LOOKS ready to me but ....
Click to expand...
Wasn't it said somewhere here that streetcars were running "express" along the Queen detour. If so, I can imagine there aren't any marked stops on Adelaide between Spadina and York. Correct me if I'm wrong.

Otherwise, I could see the TTC wanting to maintain consistency between EB and WB services.

Since Richmond doesn't have tracks there.
 
Mind_the_gap said:
Wasn't it said somewhere here that streetcars were running "express" along the Queen detour. If so, I can imagine there aren't any marked stops on Adelaide between Spadina and York. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Click to expand...
As far as I know, there's no stops marked, or unmarked on Adelaide between Spadina and York. It's been decades since an in-service car detoured there.
 
DSC said:
View attachment 614796
Click to expand...
I assume that these closures will finally deal with the RSZ around Union.

 
DSC said:
I assume that these closures will finally deal with the RSZ around Union.

Click to expand...
At least one would hope, but i'll believe it when I see it and i'm not holding my breath.
 
dowlingm said:
Without opining on the merits of particular individuals, the TTC is a massive city agency and a massive transit agency which deserves the best available leadership, wherever it comes from. It should have transit leaders from all over the world fighting to lead it, and not merely the ones looking to pad their pension pots after mediocre stints elsewhere. If this job can’t attract that kind of leader, we need to look seriously at why, whether it is the compensation, the governance environment or anything else which is causing that, and not just for positions at CEO level either.
Click to expand...
I think an issue of why top global talent will be hard to attract to TTC is that a major role of transit agencies across the world is no longer within TTC's mandate: rapid transit expansion. The chance to oversee large scale capital projects and be in the photoshoot at the ribbon-cutting ceremony is a major attraction for top talent. Running a (mostly) purely operational agency with a massively diminished role in rapid transit expansion is not as prestigious, and other options may seem attractive.

We must remember the straw that broke the camel's back in Andy Byford's stint in New York City was the Governor shifting control of subway capital projects from NYCT to the broader MTA. If someone of Byford's stature is coming to Toronto, it will be to Front and Yonge, not Davisville and Yonge.
 
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top