APTA-2048
Senior Member
Per Instagram, 3026 and 3027 are now on HCRR property.From a spotter on the CPTDB:View attachment 609920
Apparently heading to HCRR.
Per Instagram, 3026 and 3027 are now on HCRR property.From a spotter on the CPTDB:View attachment 609920
Apparently heading to HCRR.
Steve Munro has blog on this (SEE: https://stevemunro.ca/2024/11/06/50...e-begins-november-10-corrected-date/#comments ) and he notes that TTC are not following their own stop spacing standards.I note that the TTC now have the new Route map up for the 501 and they seem to be REALLY cutting back on stops!
Eastbound it stops at Queen and University (Osgood Station) and then not again until Adelaide and Yonge followed by Church at Queen.
Westbound it stops at Queen at Jarvis, Church at Richmond, Richmond at Yonge and Queen at University (Osgood Station).
At least a stop at Bay would seem like a good idea in both directions and a stop at or near Adelaide & Church going eastbound..
That's absolutely bizarre. Even if you make the distance argument, the time to get a streetcar through all the traffic lights and turns from Yonge to University is stupid.Steve Munro has blog on this (SEE: https://stevemunro.ca/2024/11/06/50...e-begins-november-10-corrected-date/#comments ) and he notes that TTC are not following their own stop spacing standards.
"TTC has confirmed that stops at York, Bay and Victoria have been dropped as they are in walking distance of other stops. Frankly I think this is a mistake considering where the existing bus service stops along the way. Nothing like making transit easily accessible."
I suggest you (And others) send a note to TTC suggestions: https://www.ttc.ca/customer-service/complaints-compliments-suggestions/Forms/suggestions-formThat's absolutely bizarre. Even if you make the distance argument, the time to get through all the traffic lights and turns from Yonge to University is stupid.
These financial district commuters are the core market. They are making it even worse to use the TTC for this diversion, not better.
Before, as you may have experienced, operators were stopping at all railway crossings, protected and otherwise.This (undated) notice just appeared on TTC website. Not sure what their old procedures were but these seem pretty standard to me
What is the point of this? I get the idea of stopping for crossings, but this seems really over the top.You're only allowed to close your driver window at the next time you stop, ideally far enough away from the railway (like a stop sign down the road, next bus stop, red light signal, etc.)
There was a high profile incident in the 70s where a TTC bus was hit by a train at a crossing on the Kingston subdivision in Scarborough. I think that's what these rules are a reaction to.What is the point of this? I get the idea of stopping for crossings, but this seems really over the top.
I know, I'm talking about the last rule requiring the driver to wait until the next time the bus has stopped to close the window. For what possible reason should it remain open until then?There was a high profile incident in the 70s where a TTC bus was hit by a train at a crossing on the Kingston subdivision in Scarborough. I think that's what these rules are a reaction to.
No arguments from me there.What is the point of this? I get the idea of stopping for crossings, but this seems really over the top.
That's absolutely bizarre. Even if you make the distance argument, the time to get a streetcar through all the traffic lights and turns from Yonge to University is stupid.
These financial district commuters are the core market for the 501 and they are making it even worse to use the TTC for this diversion, when they actually have an opportunity make it better!
Poster H4 5600 over at CPTDB posted this picture showing LED light strips installed the Kipling Stn Crossover:
View attachment 611313
Seeing them affixed to midpoint of the chain link fence is rather odd.
Apologies,
I took Line 2 between Warden and VP yesterday after a long time, and to my utter horror, I saw how the TTC had installed track lighting on that open ”railroad” stretch.
The job they did looks utterly atrocious. They just cut the (edit: 55) year-old fence in sections to make room for lamp posts. Why they even used ”standard” Toronto streetlights for this section is strange. The short poles really don’t need that long of an ”arm”.
They should’ve just replaced the fence/posts, and strung downward-facing lights from a horizontal wire. This just looks incredibly poorly done.
While the technique was interesting and the video very 'professional', I really do not like spray-painted public (or private) property. Clearly the TTC needs more cameras!This popped into my feed as well:
(Car 5072)




