Reecemartin
Active Member
TTC was supposed to install it's new wayfinding measures at Dundas, it has mostly not done so https://x.com/RM_Transit/status/1719115568954171706?s=20
TTC was supposed to install it's new wayfinding measures at Dundas, it has mostly not done so https://x.com/RM_Transit/status/1719115568954171706?s=20
Brand new bus on delivery. Some of the work is done by NFI in the US.Anyone know why a TTC bus is on the interstate near Chicago?
https://www.reddit.com/r/toronto/s/WuUXtih9ZQ
View attachment 518021
They have temporary transport permits, which is a paper stuck on the front windshield.How is it road legal with no plates?
I'll concur that I don't expect the above to make a material difference.
But I'm a bit unclear on what 'enhanced wayfinding' would make a difference here?
This is a fairly small station It has only 2 platforms, each visible from the other and from the opposite mezzanine. It has only one stair/escalator (vertical circulation point) in each mezzanine; there's only one under platform tunnel; and I think the existing signage is reasonably clear.
The suggestion, I thought, was that they could marginally improve flow, by reducing conflicting movements at the gates, by making some/all entry or exit only, in which case they come with a clear red 'x' for 'uh uh' and and green arrow for 'uh huh'.
If that helps any, great, but I don't know about calling it 'enhanced' way finding. It also strikes me a poor substitute for addressing the real issue which is that station passenger volumes exceed design capacity, particularly in the mezzanines, but also in the vertical circulation off the SB platform. (lack of down escalator)
Enlarging the mezzanine on the NB side could be done by repatriating space from the Green P garage, and/or a strata expropriation/purchase from 10 Dundas E.
The SB Mezzanine is somewhat more problematic as its constrained by the bank on the N/W corner, and taking space from TEC would be involve some $$$
The new northerly exits off the platform will probably help some; I think there may be a case to be made for additional direct exits to street off the South ends of the platforms as well.
If there's enough gates, it would make sense to use them as one-way.I mean it's just a case of not using the gates in a reasonable way that definitely worsens flow. Obviously expansion is generally also needed.
Using the gates the way they are intended shouldn't require a pilot (and we are still not doing it right)
At Dundas, you can see the train with its doors open if you're standing right outside the gates. If you couldn't go through the gates to rush the doors, there'd be a riot.Perhaps a clear next train in X minutes at the entrance, would stop many from trying to enter for a minute or two. Or making all gates exit only once the doors to the train have opened.
Plans for a Dundas Station north entrance at Gould Street fell through. It could have had crossover access to both sides.The worst aspect of Dundas station is that there's no way to get from one platform to the other without exiting & re-entering the fare-paid area, if I recall correctly (haven't been to that station in a while, but when I have, it always seemed to be the case). The same design flaw exists in many NYC stations too.
Plans for a Dundas Station north entrance at Gould Street fell through. It could have had crossover access to both sides.




