News   Jun 17, 2024
 168     0 
News   Jun 14, 2024
 2.5K     1 
News   Jun 14, 2024
 1.8K     1 

TTC: Other Items (catch all)

Check out my transfer!

402 Harbourfront
404 Spadina?
IMG_20170310_000305[1].jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20170310_000305[1].jpg
    IMG_20170310_000305[1].jpg
    652.7 KB · Views: 419
As a side note, Detroit's M-1 Rail start service May 12 night, with the official ribbon cutting and run earlier in the day. More to follow once plans are in place.
 
Streetcars aren't rapid transit. Why should they be put on a rapid transit map?

Why is the 195 Airport Rocket on a rapid transit map?

upload_2017-3-9_23-39-10-png.101596


The 510 SPADINA, 512 ST.CLAIR, 509 HARBOURFRONT, and The Queensway section of the 501 QUEEN being on right-of-ways might be one reason. Ridership might be another reason. The problem remains that the Transportation Department (Roads) still see them as a vehicle (singular) instead of transporting a large number of people.
 
Why is the 195 Airport Rocket on a rapid transit map?
Presumably because it is rapid transit. The Yonge subway (Finch to Glencairn) in AM peak averages only 23 km/hr. Service maxes out at 32.4 km/hr early Sundays and late evenings. Line 2, 3, and 4 are no faster.

The 192 Airport Rocket is 42 km/hr in AM peak, maxing out at 51.2 km/hr late at night.

That's pushing twice as fast as subway at times. How isn't it rapid transit? It's transit. And it's more rapid than the subway. And runs more frequently than some subway lines I've taken.
 
Ask London. They are the ones who did it.

This is rapid transit in London:

Tram_at_Reeves_Corner%2C_Croydon_-_geograph.org.uk_-_1238898.jpg
That's the Croydon tramlink, and on average, it takes less time to get to Wimbledon than when the route was served by trains, especially if you take into account the service interval. The keyword is "light rail", which includes the Dockland Light Railway, although "light rail" has a different meaning in Europe than it does in North Am, same as "Rapid Transit". That being said, heavy rail in tunnel (Crossrail) in London and in other European capitols is by far the fastest way across cities. (Paris RER, etc)

And here's a case of "trams" (which streetcars are). It's not the vehicle, it's the environment that limits speed, and some go even faster than this (San Diego Trolley zooms down to the Mexican border on mainline tracks, with very few stops)

Search Results
The tram operates at an average speed of 70km/h and is capable of running on multiple electric power systems with or without overhead cables. Citadis is a class of low-floor trams developed by France based... The tram operates at an average speed of 70km/h and is capable of running on...
The tram operates at an average speed of 70km/h and is capable of ...
www.railway-technology.com/projects/citadis-trams/citadis-trams2.html
 
Presumably because it is rapid transit. The Yonge subway (Finch to Glencairn) in AM peak averages only 23 km/hr. Service maxes out at 32.4 km/hr early Sundays and late evenings. Line 2, 3, and 4 are no faster.

The 192 Airport Rocket is 42 km/hr in AM peak, maxing out at 51.2 km/hr late at night.

That's pushing twice as fast as subway at times. How isn't it rapid transit? It's transit. And it's more rapid than the subway. And runs more frequently than some subway lines I've taken.
The 192 airport rocket is on the subway maps because the TTC wants to push it as an alternative to the UP EXpress.
 

Back
Top