News   Jan 07, 2026
 360     0 
News   Jan 07, 2026
 591     0 
News   Jan 07, 2026
 766     2 

"Transit system planners should focus more on connecting major employment centers"

M II A II R II K

Senior Member
Member Bio
Joined
Apr 24, 2007
Messages
3,945
Reaction score
1,068
Get back to work!


May 12th, 2011

By Robert Steuteville

Read More: http://newurbannetwork.com/article/get-back-work-14713

PDF Report: http://reconnectingamerica.org/assets/Uploads/TODandEmploymentFINALMay2011.pdf


A report, Transit-Oriented Development and Employment, makes the case that transit-oriented development (TOD) discourse has paid too little attention to major employment centers — instead concentrating on higher-density residential over retail. Research shows that both transit ridership and quantity of real estate development around transit stations are closely related to the number of jobs within a half-mile radius of transit, the authors find. So, if new transit systems are built to serve as many riders as possible and promote TOD, connecting existing large employment centers is a very good strategy, the report concludes.

Where transit already serves such centers, investment should focus on making these centers more accessible "through enhanced station area planning and design, thereby making transit, walking, and biking more attractive transportation options." The report looked in detail at transit systems in Atlanta, Phoenix, and Minneapolis/St. Paul, and also drew on recent CTOD research in Denver and Charlotte. Since "real estate development is more likely to occur in station areas that are within close proximity to major employment centers," focusing on such centers could also also foster mixed-use neighborhoods.

"Therefore, if transit is planned in a way that makes strong connections to significant employment centers, it can also promote residential TOD in places on the transit corridor where commercial uses are less likely to locate," the authors point out. "Understanding this relationship between employment centers and residential TOD is an important part of the TOD equation." The authors stress that a shift in TOD focus to employment centers should not sacrifice placemaking and human-scale planning.

"An agenda for making suburban employment clusters viable transit destinations should include placemaking as a key strategy. Density and the mix of uses, typically regulated by zoning, are established in large part at the site scale. Higher densities, along with urban site design, contribute to a transit-oriented environment with features such as mid- and high-rise buildings covering a large percentage of their sites, parking that is in a structure and in limited supply, and buildings oriented directly to public streets with a continuous and gridded sidewalk network. These features characterize most areas large enough to create large job concentrations in order to enable productive transit use."

.....




light-rail-employment.jpg





multi-destination-approach.jpg
 
That's why downtown employment population is the single best determinant of per capita transit ridership. If your employment is scattered all over the city, chances are good that people will drive. If it's concentrated downtown, people take transit. Look at Toronto: as downtown employment was rising in the 70s and 80s, transit ridership climbed in lock step. When growth stalled in the 90s, ridership growth stalled too.
 
In addition to funneling people in and out of downtown a crosstown line or 2 maybe needed as well, like in NYC for instance.
 
I completely agree that we need crosstown lines, but I think the goal should be the expansion of the core along major transit routes.

I really think that the G is the only true crosstown line in New York. Manhattan south of Central Park would be comparable to what we consider downtown and all other lines run through it. That's one of the problems with having a rapid transit network built entirely before the Second World War.

*I'd note that the G is much less busy than our Sheppard Line.
 

Back
Top