Midtown Urbanist
Superstar
Waterloo's comparison shouldn't be Toronto in any case. It should be other North American mid-size cities which have adopted LRT.
In that case it would still be fairly low. 13k would put it between Charlotte's LRT system and the Riverline LRT which services rural New Jersey, making it the 3rd lowest ridership LRT network excluding diesel services and streetcars. 18k would only move it above the Buffalo LRT, making it 4th worst.Waterloo's comparison shouldn't be Toronto in any case. It should be other North American mid-size cities which have adopted LRT.
Except it wouldn't, the notion that total ridership for a light rail system defines the success of the system is a false narrative. Many who analyze system ridership fail to account for the total length of the system they are comparing. At the worst projection, the light rail system sees 1,100K passengers per mile, which puts its ridership between DART's light Rail and SEPTA's subway surface lines. At the best case scenario, it's ridership would be around 1,525 passengers per mile, meaning it would be between TRAX light rail (lower, SLC) and the Seattle streetcar.In that case it would still be fairly low. 13k would put it between Charlotte's LRT system and the Riverline LRT which services rural New Jersey, making it the 3rd lowest ridership LRT network excluding diesel services and streetcars. 18k would only move it above the Buffalo LRT, making it 4th worst.
Attached our annual 2018 surface route ridership table. These are ranked by highest total volume. These represent typical weekday volume.
The document is via request.This article may have posted at the time but I followed up with the TTC to learn more and here is their response:
Google Drive link with Excel attachment:
CSC 309359.xlsx
drive.google.com
This is really excellent data. Thank you.This article may have posted at the time but I followed up with the TTC to learn more and here is their response:
Google Drive link with Excel attachment:
CSC 309359.xlsx
drive.google.com
Here is the APTA ridership each month from October 2018 to March 2019 in millions: 5.612, 5.605, 4.935, 11.936, 11.576, 14.530. Did ridership really triple from December to March? Not sure what's going on with their numbers.https://www.apta.com/wp-content/uploads/2019-Q1-Ridership-APTA-1.pdf
View attachment 199178
Apparently, the streetcar ridership grew 82% to 486,800 PPD over the entire network during the first quarter of 2019. Does anyone know how this happened? I don't know how growth like this makes sense.
Also, can we petition to rename the 501L to the 507 since we're bringing the 508 back?
More like increase by 70-80%. Streetcar ridership tends to be lower in the fall months because people can bike, and low in December because of the holidays. The better comparison is Jan-Mar 2018 vs Jan-Mar 2019, that's where things are really questionable.Here is the APTA ridership each month from October 2018 to March 2019 in millions: 5.612, 5.605, 4.935, 11.936, 11.576, 14.530. Did ridership really triple from December to March? Not sure what's going on with their numbers.
This could potentially explain things, but where did those additional 2 million passengers come in, and did streetcar ridership really increase by 16 million passengers annually over the course of 3 years? Assuming King's ridership actually increased by 25K PPD and that increase was seen every day (not just every weekday), that only makes up 9.125 M additional rides annually. Besides, King was always run with streetcars (whether it was the 504 or 514), so those would have been counted in the streetcar category regardless.If you look at it, streetcars went up 18 million but bus ridership dropped 16 million. Perhaps this is due to the busitution last year?