noctis
Active Member
i don't kno but to me i still think subways are better option than light rail. light rail shud be used more in the downtown area.
i don't kno but to me i still think subways are better option than light rail. light rail shud be used more in the downtown area.
I'm from Mississauga and I think it's a good idea. Why shouldn't Toronto annex Mississauga?
NYC is not building a light rail parallel to an existing subway, there are proposals by advocacy groups to so.NYC is currently building surface light rail parallel to an existing subway in Manhattan.
There's no room in the downtown area for light rail. The only street that's wide enough for it is University Ave, and as much as I would love for there to be parallel light rail/subway service on University, it's unlikely to happen for a few decades.
NYC is currently building surface light rail parallel to an existing subway in Manhattan.
Why on earth would we want to carry the dead weight of Mississauga on our shoulders? Developer payola has dried up, and now Mississauga has to pay the price for its decades of low density, pedestrian-unfriendly development under McCallion's mismanagement. It's bad enough that we have to carry Etobicoke and Scarborough along while they urbanize.
I don't get up there too much anymore but yesterday I saW construction at Vic. Park and Sheppard. Is this part of the LRT prep work or is it just regular maintenance?
Hah! I love slides 22-24 showing the transformation from the current state to what the city planners are aspiring for. All I can say is goodbye Chucky Cheese!