nfitz
Superstar
It might not be completed, because there's no street there currently, with all pedestrian traffic on the south side of Front diverted into the moat.The new stairs to the street is close since it not completed yet.
It might not be completed, because there's no street there currently, with all pedestrian traffic on the south side of Front diverted into the moat.The new stairs to the street is close since it not completed yet.
Yes, that too, but it is simply not finished yet and with the sidewalk closed no reason to do so.It might not be completed, because there's no street there currently, with all pedestrian traffic on the south side of Front diverted into the moat.
Not a problem, Metrolinx has been clear that "the public is welcome to take all the photos they want". This restriction only applies to the media.Be careful! You're taking photographs while on "private" property. See this link.
I don't believe the Star published anything with regards to the story itself, other than the arrest of the photographer. It's not like they were there to cover the story. They were passing through, and something happened. They'd be crazy not to take photographs, as you don't know what the story is until later.Wrt to the photo issue. I have to say I find it a bit shocking that the Star is looking for the type of tabloid journalism that is associated with catching an image of an injured, or gasp deceased, victim. It's strange that they would equate patrons snapping 'fanboy/girl' 'tourism' photos with a journalist grabbing a photo of an injured transit employee. What next, listening in on TTC radio channels and running to grab images of the next subway jumper???