reinventingthewheel
Active Member
Yes there are many design criteria, this is always implied. It does not excuse the time taken to deliver this. From this extraordinary planning time it is natural to expect something flawless.I think the funny part is how people will complain it takes far too long to process, suggesting we just do xyz…
Then goes on to be critical about a particular option, as if that’s NOT why it takes forever to make a decision.
Off the top of my head, things to think about:
1. Cost
2. Durability
3. Transport/install
4. Does it fit the surroundings?
5. What kind of vehicle can it take an impact from
6. How easy/cheap is it to maintain
7. Placement (effectiveness, accessibility)
8. City bylaws?
9. Risk assessment, how could people hurt themselves on it and what liability would the city hold? How do we mitigate
Now, figure a lot of information is out there already. Is it readily accessible and reliable?Are the people making the decisions experienced, or new to this? Was there turnover in the dept or is the responsibility now in another dept? Is there budget pressure? Councillor problems? Stakeholder meetings? Union Station input? Do cab drivers have an issue with placement? Etc etc.
I see this stuff like trying to organize a pizza party for 20 kids. For all your best intentions and ideas you just end up with pepperoni and extra cheese.
It’s more like a pizza order where you waited several hours so you expected something gourmet but all you got was a frozen pizza.
If we don’t ridicule this for being unideal and delivered too slow, then we are excusing the city and other agencies to repeat that.
Last edited: