I have to respond to this kind of 'comparison'. The Polo 1 is a very old condo and has a very different price point and market value to a new condo. I've seen this kind of comparison in other threads like "L tower/London are so expensive...especially when you can get a condo at 25 Esplanade for almost half!". All condos that happen to be close to each other do not automatically have to have the same price. Age of building, amenities, quality of finishes, size of unit, ceiling height, etc. all play a part. My condo is right next to where the new Four Seasons condos will be, are you suggesting that the buyers there are getting ripped off because at $1500 psf because they could buy in my building for $668-700? I bought in 18 Yorkville, because I love the feel of the building and the location, but there is also a VERY old condo directly across the street from me that appears it was built in the 70s and units there are half the price, but they are run down and look like rentals. Should they also be the benchmark for every new building in Yorkville? Do people actually think that the cheapest oldest building in any given neighbourhood should set the price point for every new luxury building that gets built in the area? Crazy. Every building is a different 'product' with a different price point that will appeal to a different audience.