E.B.
Active Member
Yeah, sure... Just like the bottle caps at Absolute World. I hope I'm wrong though.
The bottle caps are now lit up with changing colour LED's.
Yeah, sure... Just like the bottle caps at Absolute World. I hope I'm wrong though.
Then we need someone with Bill Paley's money to pay for it.
Because Brad Lamb is probably pretty broke. (If not Brad, maybe Galen Westin, Rogers family, the Gardiners, etc.....) Toronto doesn't lack cheap millionaires or billionaires for that matter.
By choosing to cut costs on things that don't affect purchasers units (and therefore they don't have to be compensated), such as water features at the entrance and mechanical roof elements, they can pocket the difference as profit. Perhaps they were tempted by being over budget?
Yes, but the glass was supposed to be clear at the top.The bottle caps are now lit up with changing colour LED's.
Technically he could have cut the bands altogether without having to compensate purchasers. Clearly there is some effort being spent on something other than profit. This may be an instance of the cheapening, but I still think Lamb should be given credit despite not delivering a perfectly as-rendered tower.
It's the discolouration of the mechanical box which I find the most baffling as that shouldn't really have anything to do with cost.
Technically he could have cut the bands altogether without having to compensate purchasers.
08 August 2014:
Technically he could have cut the bands altogether without having to compensate purchasers. Clearly there is some effort being spent on something other than profit. This may be an instance of the cheapening, but I still think Lamb should be given credit despite not delivering a perfectly as-rendered tower.
It's the discolouration of the mechanical box which I find the most baffling as that shouldn't really have anything to do with cost.