wolfewood
Active Member
Did I? I am not even necessarily against the idea of tearing down 774 Yonge, but what has been put forward to suggest that the development will be worth it? Nothing, considering the lack of available information. What evidence have you received that would suggest it is a definitive "architectural plus"? Feel free to share it with us? Barring that, it would appear that you have made a leap of faith based on nothing but commentary.
I am saying this as someone who is quite fond of Lord Foster's works over the years, and is happy at the prospect of having a F+P tower at that intersection - I am just not willing to suggest that we should suspend our judgement or rush to tear down a structure with established worth on the sole basis of words in a few trade articles that is high on exaltations and low on concrete details.
AoD
Exactly my sentiments, as well as arvelomcquaig's below. God forbid a developer with no credentials beyond a couple kitschy midrises should be allowed to demolish a huge chunk of historic Yonge (ugly, beautiful or mediocre) without providing some kind of legitimate plan. But apparently the same people who fetishize development have a thing for empty lots too?