AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Not bad overall, though the rendering does suggest an abundance of mullions/spandrels - which is unfortunate considering its' neighbours.
AoD
AoD
To me, it looks like the designers were trying too hard to make capital-A Rotterdam-style Architecture... I just don't understand the point of stacking a bunch of different mini buildings on top of one another in such a way. I for one don't find the overall effect cool & innovative, but rather busy & disjointed.
Busy and disjointed, just like Toronto. In the contextual sense I like messy and disjointed architecture, within reason (depending on the reasoner).
Does anyone know that this design is anything more than a concept for a a competition like the Signature Tower design we saw in that thread (http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showthread.php/6394-CityPlace-Signature-Tower-(Concord-Adex-69-s)/page24 ???
It was already stated in that thread that the Signature Tower renderings were only a concept for a competition and would not be coming to fruition. Why do we think this one is anything different?
Personally I think it looks a mess.
And then we're left with yet another boring glass box.
Okay, gang, I took a while to stare at it and digest it. I like it. I think it works contextually. There may be an issue w.r.t. the view corridor, from lower Bay, (old City Hall backdrop) hence this tower may not see the light of day as proposed here.