Toronto Ten York Street Condos | 224.02m | 65s | Tridel | Wallman Architects

442JCFa.jpg




8gDe6d1.jpg
 
Today:
IMG_0835.jpg
IMG_0836.JPG
IMG_0839.jpg
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0835.jpg
    IMG_0835.jpg
    444.4 KB · Views: 1,067
  • IMG_0836.JPG
    IMG_0836.JPG
    313 KB · Views: 686
  • IMG_0839.jpg
    IMG_0839.jpg
    494.4 KB · Views: 1,095
Today:
tenyorkIMG_0918.JPG
tenyorkIMG_0919.JPG
tenyorkIMG_1038.JPG
 

Attachments

  • tenyorkIMG_0918.JPG
    tenyorkIMG_0918.JPG
    2.7 MB · Views: 844
  • tenyorkIMG_0919.JPG
    tenyorkIMG_0919.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 896
  • tenyorkIMG_1038.JPG
    tenyorkIMG_1038.JPG
    892.3 KB · Views: 686
I find it interesting that people are so surprised by how this building turned out. I guess everyone's image of Tridel was tainted because of 300 Front at the time, but this building was always obviously going to turn out well. Here's a few reasons why, in order of importance: curtain wall cladding, minimal balconies (and especially, no aA wraparound balcony garbage), unique shape, Wallman Architects. It's no surprise that this building has turned out well; for me personally, it's definitely in the top 10 buildings to go up since 2000 in this city, and that includes office and residential.
 
I find it interesting that people are so surprised by how this building turned out. I guess everyone's image of Tridel was tainted because of 300 Front at the time, but this building was always obviously going to turn out well. Here's a few reasons why, in order of importance: curtain wall cladding, minimal balconies (and especially, no aA wraparound balcony garbage), unique shape, Wallman Architects. It's no surprise that this building has turned out well; for me personally, it's definitely in the top 10 buildings to go up since 2000 in this city, and that includes office and residential.

It turned out Okay, not spectacular by even Toronto's standard. I like how the Podium turned out but the tower just gets lost amidst all those GRAY glasses. It could have stand out better with Black or Bronze glass.
That said, people's criticism of Tridel is valid because despite their vast number of projects in the city mostly in visible and important areas, Tridel cannot boast of any of their their projects as architectural landmark.
 
Tridel did a good job with the Republic Of Yonge And Eglinton and this building's arguably a step up for them. Otherwise, architecturally, their projects suck. They do know their public well though. I'll grant them that. Tridel purchasers/investors just love those kitschy, Scarlet O'Hara/Joan Crawford lobby stairs they're so famous for.
 
Tridel did a good job with the Republic Of Yonge And Eglinton and this building's arguably a step up for them.
I've seen (at least what I interpret to be) a clear progression in design for Tridel buildings over the last few years. aA, Teeple, 3XN. All improvements over earlier choices
 
^^^I wouldn't call 300 Front or Aqualina progressions. Regressions, maybe. aA, Teeple and 3XN won't matter much if Tridel--the reigning queen of "The Cheapening"--takes their designs and executes them as dismally as it can get away with, which in this town is pretty dismal indeed.
 
Last edited:
^^^I wouldn't call 300 Front or Aqualina progressions. Regressions, maybe.
I definitely agree with that part. I guess time will tell with the aA, Teeple, and 3XN projects.
 

Back
Top