Looks like it will be tomorrow now.
42
42
Toronto St Lawrence Market North | 25.3m | 5s | City of Toronto | Rogers Stirk Harbour
ProjectEnd
Superstar
For those decrying the 'barn' form, recall that Rogers' own office in London (Thames Wharf Studios) features a remarkably similar roof:
ponyboy
Active Member
the renders on the neighbourhood association website (http://www.slna.ca/slna-northmarket.html) appear much better than the crude redesign renders a few pages back. I think this will work well. I only wish there was some way to create a tunnel from the basement of the south market to the north to address traffic flow bottlenecks.
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Ponyboy:
It would be tough to create an underground connection that would be more than a corridor to the underground parking. Not sure if that would be worth it. Wish they could excavate the south market down one more level though.
AoD
It would be tough to create an underground connection that would be more than a corridor to the underground parking. Not sure if that would be worth it. Wish they could excavate the south market down one more level though.
AoD
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
It's on council right now:
Maybe that's why Pam voted the way she did for the SRT/BD debate?
AoD
Maybe that's why Pam voted the way she did for the SRT/BD debate?
AoD
DSC
Superstar
Member Bio
- Joined
- Jan 13, 2008
- Messages
- 19,656
- Reaction score
- 28,182
- Location
- St Lawrence Market Area
It's being discussed tight now. 10.28
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Still going an hour later. I do find this comment a bit hypocritical though:
From someone who voted to approve a subway extension with a far higher liability, that has gone through far less planning vigour and less financial certainty.
Looks like the vote will be close.
AoD
From someone who voted to approve a subway extension with a far higher liability, that has gone through far less planning vigour and less financial certainty.
Looks like the vote will be close.
AoD
Last edited:
AlvinofDiaspar
Moderator
Done - not even close.
AoD
AoD
p5connex
Active Member
That is good news then - thanks for keeping us posted AoD.
UrbanAffair
Senior Member
Let me guess who that one "no" vote was from...
Great news, glad to see some initiative on an important project.
christiesplits
Senior Member
Question for clarity:
Does the passed motion to "push ahead St. Lawrence Market North development" refer to the original winning design or the revised less-costly design?
Does the passed motion to "push ahead St. Lawrence Market North development" refer to the original winning design or the revised less-costly design?
ProjectEnd
Superstar
Revised design.
khris
Senior Member
And once again Toronto will get something that is just okay and satisfying instead of a landmark. Blah. Maybe it will turn out better than the renders.
Torontovibe
Senior Member
We always seem to get set up for disappointment. I don't know why they get our expectations up, only to deliver a compromised design. City Hall needs to get its act together and deliver what they promise, not a watered down version.
Xray_Crystal_Junkie
Senior Member
I think it's worse knowing what could have been. Now I'm sure when I look at features like the puny external, wooden (?) louvres I'll just try to imagine how much better they should have been. The same could probably be said about many of the little details.
I like the rounded roof better though, it's unique in larger buildings.
I like the rounded roof better though, it's unique in larger buildings.