Red October
Senior Member
The sidewalk is public property.. there's no laws stopping you from taking pictures from it
I saw we all show up en masse and do this. Anyone want to set a time and date? I'll definitely go
Nevernamed, you know better.
Buttcon and security are there on behalf of Loblaws. And frankly people here need to get over the photo thing.
You especially have seen inside personally. What are you complaining about?
As for photos at Church street, at least the place is dim enough that most smaries who "steal" a shot will
get a blurry mess and not much detail of how it is. That said, the making of the new store and athletic center
shouldn't be a more fascinating image than the demo phase where there is more frame of reference to the past.
BTW folks, us guards don't especially enjoy having to advise people of the property owner's wishes.
You should be content trying to look up the dress of Britney Spears as she climbs from a car.
You're not missing a darn thing, so please move along nicely. Thanks. And when the arm is down blocking
your way, that's not just us power tripping either. Careful of the trucks.
Wait for the professional photos that will be made public after the place is open so there's not as much
crying and moping over the "shame" of someone actually turning unfit seating into a functioning
facility -- much better than the 10 or 11 years nobody cared (other than Flashpoint, Cinderella Man,
Death to Smoochy, Battle of the Blades and apparently the Pride people who left a mess).
It's a building. The ghosts are gone by the way too. Thanks.
if i was making the kind of money Jawsphobia makes, i would be a prick too
I clearly understand that being too near a demolition site is a safety and liability issue for the property owners and therefore guards must protect their interests from trespassers, but photography from a public and legal distance? What unsafe practices, illegal activity or Area 51-style alien technology are these people trying to hide?