picard102
Senior Member
Surprised they got away such a badly composed logo.
Last edited by a moderator:
As opposed to the ugly as sin, globally outsourced copycat version that cost $x?
AoD
The black and white cuts down on their letterhead and advertising costs.
Goes to show you that there is a pretty small thinking group running this show.
As I commented on the front page, I don't know why they're planning on planting trees in front of the Crystal. Architectural landmarks shouldn't be obscured by trees. It seems that few people love the Crystal, but obscuring a landmark with trees is bad form.
Trees grow tall and wide with time and block views of buildings.
^ LOL. What I find more interesting is that no one from the city realized this deficiency in the first place. All of this could have been addressed 7 years ago if someone had the balls to call Libeskind out on this design.
Furthermore, I find it a bit of a stretch to call the ROM a 'great architectural landmark'. Denver got the original design. We got the 'napkin' version. Not exactly original or groundbreaking and I don't believe it us put on the global architectural map.