Civdis
Active Member
I am happy they are going back to the original. Makes for a cleaner design and I would assume a lot of the infrastructure is in place to implement this design easier.
The alternative so unaesthetic lol. Hopefully this actually happens!I am happy they are going back to the original. Makes for a cleaner design and I would assume a lot of the infrastructure is in place to implement this design easier.
Unfortunately it looks like the big arched roof is going away in the new scheme along with the curves of the original design...I am happy they are going back to the original. Makes for a cleaner design and I would assume a lot of the infrastructure is in place to implement this design easier.
It's about damn time some common sense came back to the execs heads over at the GTAA.Indeed GTAA held an Industry Forum on 4th December to provide information on their 10-year capital plan. Presentation is here.
The layout of the T1 expansion seems to have returned to new piers:
View attachment 621166
View attachment 621169
This is great news. My only gripe is they seem to be abandoning the Safdie concept vaulted arrivals/departures hall. But as long as the floor plan is coherent with the masterplan I am satisfied.Indeed GTAA held an Industry Forum on 4th December to provide information on their 10-year capital plan. Presentation is here.
The layout of the T1 expansion seems to have returned to new piers:
View attachment 621166
View attachment 621169
There seems to be some very good design decisions being made here. The rendering appears to have three floors, which likely means the US preclearance area will be on its own floor, which would give a lot of flexibility for gating planes and also means the preclearance area won't feel as walled off from the rest of the airport (the Z pier at FRA with separate Schengen and non-Schengen floors works like this).Indeed GTAA held an Industry Forum on 4th December to provide information on their 10-year capital plan. Presentation is here.
The layout of the T1 expansion seems to have returned to new piers
I wouldn't say the that the transit hub is dead per say. Timeline pushed back sure. I think the biggest thing (or at least I hope) is that the passenger processing part of the plan is dropped.So the whole Pearson Union station and new hub east of Airport Road is dead then by the look of it. Or at least pushed off well into the 2040s or 2050s.
So where is Line 5 going to come in? Hopefully there's a way to integrate it into that new extension.
Definitely some good news to hear, Ethiopian is Africa's strongest carrier and their expansion and stability is pretty astonishing to see. It's amazing that it takes a carrier who's home base is not Ghana, to finally connect Canada and West Africa.Ethiopian Airlines has been granted fifth freedom rights to operate from Toronto to Accra, Ghana and then onto Ethiopian. This will make it easier for West Africans in GTA and Canada to travel back home. It’s supposed to start first quarter of 2025.
It's Ghana be exciting! | Aviation Week Network
A new era takes flight – how Ghana is rising through the ranks as a West African aviation hotspot.www.timesaerospace.aero
Long term Air Canada also seems interested in flying direct flights to West Africa with Dakar, Abidjan, Accra, and Lagos as potential destinations.
Long term Air Canada also seems interested in flying direct flights to West Africa with Dakar, Abidjan, Accra, and Lagos as potential destinations.
Avgeeks on the internet have been talking about AC service to sub-Saharan Africa for almost as long as the internet has existed. I'll believe it when I see it, these are long routes that will eat lots of frames, with low yields and lots of complex security and regulatory issues. Delta has made a niche of Africa services mostly from ATL and JFK (which get feed to and from Canada), but none of the other US3 have really managed to replicate them.As for Air Canada, they've been all talk about service to Africa for as long as I can remember. I'll continue to not take them seriously on that front.
^this. I remember this discussion internally when i worked at AC in the late 90s.Avgeeks on the internet have been talking about AC service to sub-Saharan Africa for almost as long as the internet has existed. I'll believe it when I see it, these are long routes that will eat lots of frames, with low yields and lots of complex security and regulatory issues. Delta has made a niche of Africa services mostly from ATL and JFK (which get feed to and from Canada), but none of the other US3 have really managed to replicate them.
Maybe, but there are lots of other considerations, like:^Just one little thing that may be guiding their thinking: the number of people in the country from this area has surged over the last 10 years.




