micheal_can
Senior Member
For a line that was the pride of someone touting Subways, Subways, Subways, this is very much not sounding like a subway.
For a line that was the pride of someone touting Subways, Subways, Subways, this is very much not sounding like a subway.
Its funny how language has such a huge effect on policy and culture.
If we had adopted the phrase Metro instead of subway, perhaps people wouldn't have an obsession and fetishization of tunneling our mass transit.
Not really. For example, if they had referred to the SRT as a Subway line, then the public would understand how a tunnel is not the only way to go. It is just like if they had labeled all new LRTs as Streetcars, there would not be the confusion.
I deserve a Starbucks because I'm a millennial.Ok but if my grandmother had wheels she would be a bicycle.
Why would anyone refer to the SRT as a subway? Thats exactly my point, they wouldn't. Which creates a linguistic distinction between the subway system and the SRT.
If however we called the subway system a Metro, you could more logically call the SRT a Metro as well, and there would not be such a compartmentation between the two systems.
The words we use affect our patterns of behaviors and how we view the world.
Please no, Ottawa choosing what are basically low floor trams for its metro system was a shot in the foot for the whole networkIf the line is catenary powered they (Metrolinx) might as well just choose the Alstom Citadis Spirit instead of they really wanted to save money, those trains have a maximum speed of 105km/h and can be configured as long as 60m
View attachment 289595
Language definitely has that power to shape perceptions. Like most people support estate tax but hate the death tax (despite being the exact same policy).Its funny how language has such a huge effect on policy and culture.
If we had adopted the phrase Metro instead of subway, perhaps people wouldn't have an obsession and fetishization of tunneling our mass transit.
I deserve a Starbucks because I'm a millennial.
Ok but if my grandmother had wheels she would be a bicycle.
Why would anyone refer to the SRT as a subway? Thats exactly my point, they wouldn't. Which creates a linguistic distinction between the subway system and the SRT.
If however we called the subway system a Metro, you could more logically call the SRT a Metro as well, and there would not be such a compartmentation between the two systems.
The words we use affect our patterns of behaviors and how we view the world.
Seriously. Choosing a low floor tram for a fully grade separated line would be idiotic.Please no, Ottawa choosing what are basically low floor trams for its metro system was a shot in the foot for the whole network
Next up, Toronto mandates all Subway sandwich stores must be located below grade.I deserve a subway because im a Scarberian. And subways ALWAYS run underground. Its in the name, SUBway. Duh.
Its a totally legit reason why elevated is better. Having spent a lot of time in London are far preferred having a view to none at all. . .