Coolstar
Senior Member
Cost comparison comparing the OL to the RLS.
Wow, way to completely not answer the first question.Cost comparison comparing the OL to the RLS.
That doesn't make sense though, RLS didn't even include a maintenance facility in its design. The projected cost of the OL includes operating costs, costs of new vehicles, and the MSF. RLS only has the tracks, stations, and new vehicles, and operating cost. If the OL is cheaper per km even including the maintenance facility, then that's looking at OL even more favourably.Longer lines typically have a lower per-km cost than shorter line. One-off costs, such as the Maintenance Storage Facility, being spread out over larger scope favour the longer line in these comparisons. The RLN would almost certainly have a lower per km cost than the RLS, likely making the per-km cost of the entire RL project more or less equal to the OL.
That doesn't make sense though, RLS didn't even include a maintenance facility in its design. The projected cost of the OL includes operating costs, costs of new vehicles, and the MSF. RLS only has the tracks, stations, and new vehicles, and operating cost. If the OL is cheaper per km even including the maintenance facility, then that's looking at OL even more favourably.
What? What does the Ontario Line have anything to do with the Obico Yard? The Obico yard if built will only service Line 2 trains. If anything, since Ontario Line runs on its own stock the Obico Yard would only have to be built smaller...With Ontario Line, Obico yard would have be made much larger and that will cost a lot of money. The added cost won't be marginal.
The repetition of a continuous station viewed from a train is bringing back memories of Chemical Brothers lol
Sorry I meant RL.What? What does the Ontario Line have anything to do with the Obico Yard? The Obico yard if built will only service Line 2 trains. If anything, since Ontario Line runs on its own stock the Obico Yard would only have to be built smaller...
More ground sampling work in the King and Bathurst area. This rig is in the laneway beside 58 Stewart Street - scheduled to be here for approximately four weeks, according to the notice sent to area residents. After all the ground sampling already done in this area - Wellington Street, Portland Street itself, Bathurst, Niagara, multiple spots around the intersection of Niagara and Tecumseth. Apparently - this bore hole is to be 60 Meters deep - in other words between 195 and 200 feet deep.
View attachment 282371
In Toronto? Not likely ... they'll monitor for it, as is standard. But they aren't looking for it.They are also looking for pockets of methane gas underground. Methane gas is odourless and colourless, and can explode or catch fire. Methane is the main constituent of natural gas. That's why there is all that drilling and testing for any underground whatever.
The repetition of a continuous station viewed from a train is bringing back memories of Chemical Brothers lol