That question may be better posed to
@Filip who thinks Keesmaat is at fault for most of the current conditions at Humber Bay
While she's not perfect and it's fair to pin some of the issues on here (and rightly so), it is wrong to put the blame on her for why Humber Bay is the mess that it is today.
I agree that she and the planning department could have, and should have done a lot more for transit in the area. The department's wilful ignorance of the transit issue was disgusting to say the least. With parks and rec, that ties in closely with the surrounding development that has already taken place. It was a missed opportunity, and half of the developments were already in the pipeline by the time she was selected the chief planner. By that time it was already too late since the OMB was just having their way with the neighborhood because of the failure of the city's failure for the 6-8 year period before that. There is nothing that could have been done with the road network by the time Keesmaat was chief planner because Humber Bay is in essence an island that is separated by the Humber River to the west, rail tracks to the north, and Mimico Creek to the east. The road network should have been planned out beforeall of the developments wer in the pipeline, and that again comes down to the city's lack of planning before all of the developments were proposed. Since the city didn't have a plan, the OMB essentially devised one for them through the Places to Grow Act.
I'm in no way giving Keesmaat a carte blanche for what has taken place in Humber Bay, but if people are going to blame her at least know exactly what it is that you're putting the blame on her for.
Like I said before, the large part of the blame should go to David Miller and Mark Grimes who were all present when Humber Bay was a quiet motel strip with nothing actively planned for the neighborhood. Ted Tyndorf and Gary Wright also deserve blame to an extent for not coming up with a concrete plan, or even having a plan in general