evandyk
Senior Member
That forest of towers rising in the severely underpopulated Annex is such a beautiful sight. Now we just need way more of the same.
In Toronto, even white is a welcome change.Some colour here would have made this even better. Then again, this is my opinion on pretty much every development.
Severely underpopulated? It's one of the densest neighbourhoods in Toronto at 10,614 people per sq km (13th overall) compared to a Toronto CMA average of 866 people per sq km. This is old data from the 2006 census too, so if anything it's even denser now.That forest of towers rising in the severely underpopulated Annex is such a beautiful sight. Now we just need way more of the same.
Being this project's only weakness IMO is not that bad at all in the end. Thumbs way, way up for this one so far!Some colour here would have made this even better. Then again, this is my opinion on pretty much every development.
It reminds me a bit of Las Vegas' New York-New York complex. Just insert rollercoaster!
I agree with both of those ideas, specifically main streets; although in my view perhaps almost anywhere, with caveats to protect/retain heritage buildings. I do apologize if I've misinterpreted your posts in the past.I don't think that any SFH *should* be replaced. I just think it should be legal to build denser forms such as small apartment buildings anywhere, including established SFH neighbourhoods, should the property owner wish to.
Edit to add: Not quite accurate. I think SFH that are on major streets like Bathurst etc and are within a few hundred metres of subway stations should be replaced with apartments of some form.