Chris R.
Senior Member
We went to a concert Friday night and I was reminded of the absolute beauty that Hamilton Place is. Hamilton got really unlucky with Jackson Square and City Centre in that they ruined areas of the city that would have recovered by now, while Hamilton gained some amazing architecture, community and meeting spaces. The Art Gallery is another such amazing space. I'm glad this McMaster building is nearby, as I think you are right that it continues to evoke that historic modernist architecture that Hamilton is partly known for in some very small areas of the city.The choices made with this building are really interesting. I don't know if it's completely successful, but in this case, it's kind of good not knowing. It's bold and different while working hard to be an asset, and these days, that's saying something.
I grew up near Hamilton in the '70's, and Hamilton had been building a lot of stuff that was brutalist and partook of some of the decades cliche's - smoked and bronzed glass, concrete and precast brownish panels, angled piers and columns, the occasional moat. To a younger me, it all looked ravishingly futuristic. Hamilton Place, Jackson Square and The Art Gallery, especially.
To me, this building seems to pick up some of those tropes and run with them. I don't know how to explain it, but it "feels" like a Hamilton building. It looks a bit neo-'brutalist' to me, with it's pushed and folded forms. It's meant to state it's presence, and it does. Nifty.
Hamilton similarly has an amazing collection of mid-century modern homes spread around. There are some really great gems around. Hamilton should be trying to not just do modernism, nor historicism, but to do something different. Akin to how Montreal is also doing neither. Medium cities have the power to be actually interesting as there isn't pressure to be everywhere all at once like a Toronto or Vancouver.