Toronto Max Condos | 113.99m | 36s | Tribute | Graziani + Corazza

[interchange42]

Hmm, must be more than just 75 Mutual. Maybe 77 and/or 73 as well.

75 is a three storey unremarkable ruined Victorian, while 77 is a totally non-descript two-storey thing with a roof over some walls. 73 is a would-be Georgian. None would be a great loss.

42

 

[Stupidandshallow]

So I guess this is no longer affiliated with Ryerson University? Does anyone know?

http://urbantoronto.ca/forum/showth...al-Street-s-of-Dundas-29s-regionalArchitects)

 

[interchange42]

Thanks for remembering that thread Stupid. We'll have to wait for a little more information to find out if this is the 77 project, or if this is another project to the south of it.

42

 

[Big Daddy]

Hmm, must be more than just 75 Mutual. Maybe 77 and/or 73 as well.

75 is a three storey unremarkable ruined Victorian, while 77 is a totally non-descript two-storey thing with a roof over some walls. 73 is a would-be Georgian. None would be a great loss.

42

Historical designation?

Or does that only apply to buildings that appeal to certain people?

Or perhaps there is just no merit in interfering with thisparticular project.

 

[DSC]

Historical designation?

Or does that only apply to buildings that appeal to certain people?

Or perhaps there is just no merit in interfering with thisparticular project.

None of these buildings are on the City inventory http://app.toronto.ca/HeritagePreservation/setup.do?action=init Of course, the City is not very proactive about Listing or Designating and often only does so when a development application gets them moving into action.

 

[Automation Gallery]

None of these buildings are on the City inventory .

Thank god for that, cause with a heritage designation half of these houses in the old city of Toronto wouldnt be worth a hoot

 

[interchange42]

Historical designation?

Or does that only apply to buildings that appeal to certain people?

Or perhaps there is just no merit in interfering with thisparticular project.

Not really sure what you're getting at. Have you looked these three up?

42

 

[Stupidandshallow]

Plans and drawings from July! http://www.gardendistrict.ca/pb/wp_30642c17/20140825 75 Mutual Plans and Drawings.Pdf

Anyone have any details on the context drawings in the above document which includes 30 mutual/88 queen st -- is that just based on what is currently allowed/the zoning for that site?

 

[Mongo]

Some images from that PDF:

 

[urbandreamer]

Tribute Communities with G+C Looks like spandrel hell

 

[interchange42]

Plans and drawings from July! http://www.gardendistrict.ca/pb/wp_30642c17/20140825 75 Mutual Plans and Drawings.Pdf

Anyone have any details on the context drawings in the above document which includes 30 mutual/88 queen st -- is that just based on what is currently allowed/the zoning for that site?

I'm not sure if it represents what is zoned, or what the last application on that site was (that can be looked up), but there is nothing active there at the moment as far as I know.

42

 

[innsertnamehere]

wasn't there a basic rezoning of it 5 or 6 years ago where the "buildings" where nothing but basic shapes and it was clear that it was simply an upzoning and not an effort to actually build something?

 

[AlbertC]

 

[Irishmonk]

Looks pretty slick in that render. Anyone know who the architect is?

 

[khris]

Looks pretty slick in that render. Anyone know who the architect is?

It appears to be Graziani & Corazza. For Tribute.

It looks like they have some sort of bike carousel or something? Interesting.
THe design is okay. Especially if they keep the rounded glass on the balcony corners. Anything with some flourish of design in this area is really an upgrade. It's nice to see development happening east of Yonge in this rough area that really needs some improvements.