Toronto Lower Don Lands Redevelopment | ?m | ?s | Waterfront Toronto

DensityDan said:
I'm very curious what the common pronunciation of Wonscotonach would settle on. This Global News article says its proper pronunciation is "waw-sco-taw-NAWSH". And this song backs that up, though the singing leaves pitch placement ambiguous when spoken.
But my initial read of it as a native Anglo is "wahn-skoh-TAH-natch" (last vowel like snatch, or possibly reduced to something like pitch). I could see lots of people being confused by the n's when the proper pronunciation doesn't seem to use nasal sounds, or by the ch on the end which is used more like it is in French.
Click to expand...

The Don or Wonscotonach Estuary works.
 
DensityDan said:
I'm very curious what the common pronunciation of Wonscotonach would settle on... I could see lots of people being confused by the n's when the proper pronunciation doesn't seem to use nasal sounds, or by the ch on the end which is used more like it is in French.
Click to expand...

It can become another Toronto shibboleth, so you can tell whether the speaker is a local or not, like "Baby Point" or "Spadina" (or "Toronto" itself)
 
adHominem said:
It can become another Toronto shibboleth, so you can tell whether the speaker is a local or not, like "Baby Point"
Click to expand...
As someone who has lived here over 40 years (albeit north east part of the city)...Never heard about this one (It's pronounced Babby point for those who didn't know).
adHominem said:
or "Spadina"
Click to expand...
I think this one depends if you're talking about the museum or the street? seems to me the house/museum had the ee sound.
adHominem said:
(or "Toronto" itself)
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure i got this down.
 
Canada geese!




Some shots of the emerging playground structures on the southeast side of Commissioners and Old Cherry.
IMG_7435.jpeg
IMG_7436.jpeg
IMG_7437.jpeg
IMG_7438.jpeg
IMG_7439.jpeg
IMG_7440.jpeg
IMG_7441.jpeg
 
I can see a debate forming of to allow for erosion or not for erosion, that is the question. Whether 'tis nobler in the mind to let the river suffer... 🙀
 
DSC said:
I think the whole area is designed NOT to have erosion - without encasing the river in concrete..
Click to expand...
It's a tricky call though. On one hand one would want the river to flow and ebb as naturally as possible...while at the same time, without washing massive costing for this project out into depths of the respective lake. So I guess it's creating fixed obstructions as naturally as possible based on how river dynamics work...and hope a family of beavers don't show up to reroute it all. >.<
 
Thank you! I have taken a few screenshots of information from the 2017 documents listed in the above to give a rough idea of what was seen as appropriate guidelines on the understanding that this could totally change!

I will also note that 6 Leslie Street is being actively promoted. This thread is getting large.




IMG_7549.png
IMG_7548.png
IMG_7547.png
IMG_7546.png
IMG_7544.png
IMG_7543.png
IMG_7553.png
IMG_7552.png
IMG_7552.png
 

Attachments

  • IMG_7542.png
    IMG_7542.png
    638.4 KB · Views: 109
  • IMG_7551.png
    IMG_7551.png
    744.9 KB · Views: 103
Last edited:
You must log in or register to post here.

Back
Top