Toronto King Blue by Greenland | 155.75m | 48s | Greenland | Arcadis

DSC00136.jpg

DSC00137.jpg

DSC00138.jpg

DSC00139.jpg


DSC00142.jpg


DSC00151.jpg
 

Attachments

  • DSC00136.jpg
    DSC00136.jpg
    54.7 KB · Views: 465
  • DSC00137.jpg
    DSC00137.jpg
    55.1 KB · Views: 465
  • DSC00138.jpg
    DSC00138.jpg
    46.1 KB · Views: 447
  • DSC00139.jpg
    DSC00139.jpg
    57.2 KB · Views: 443
  • DSC00142.jpg
    DSC00142.jpg
    72.2 KB · Views: 474
  • DSC00151.jpg
    DSC00151.jpg
    33.2 KB · Views: 450
Last edited by a moderator:
Thursday:
1IMG_9559.JPG
2IMG_9561.JPG
3IMG_9635.JPG
 

Attachments

  • 1IMG_9559.JPG
    1IMG_9559.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 448
  • 2IMG_9561.JPG
    2IMG_9561.JPG
    2 MB · Views: 414
  • 3IMG_9635.JPG
    3IMG_9635.JPG
    1.1 MB · Views: 438
I know there is a lot more to go but I actually like what I see so far. I'm expecting the cladding to ruin that for me though.
 
Interesting couple tidbits in a recent CoA minor variance application here for those interested in what parking demand looks like these days in this neighbourhood at this price point.

The cover letter notes that all 910 res units have been sold but only 220 of the available 251 res parking spaces have been sold, and they're applying to have the City allow them to re-designate all but one of those surplus parking spots for commercial parking uses.

A parking study referenced in the letter confirms that the uptake rate of 0.24 parking spaces per res dwelling unit is consistent with demand for the area.

The history of CoA variances reducing the amount of res parking spaces is an interesting one (and probably could be read as being illustrative of the City's policies lagging market demand):
> Variance #1: from 522 to 494 spaces
> Variance #2: from 494 to 250 spaces
> Variance #3: from 251 to (effectively) 220 spaces
 
March 31st: looking much better with the bracing down

4BD6C033-DC9B-4FC5-A85F-B6B6CDC4F4EC.jpeg
CF2F9243-A197-4651-9E33-4B37DC094628.jpeg
24597437-142C-47B9-AB8E-A4A7DF0E18C2.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • 4BD6C033-DC9B-4FC5-A85F-B6B6CDC4F4EC.jpeg
    4BD6C033-DC9B-4FC5-A85F-B6B6CDC4F4EC.jpeg
    224.1 KB · Views: 438
  • CF2F9243-A197-4651-9E33-4B37DC094628.jpeg
    CF2F9243-A197-4651-9E33-4B37DC094628.jpeg
    225.6 KB · Views: 412
  • 24597437-142C-47B9-AB8E-A4A7DF0E18C2.jpeg
    24597437-142C-47B9-AB8E-A4A7DF0E18C2.jpeg
    240.6 KB · Views: 405
  • FFB1AFC2-B9C7-49B1-AED0-BB25685D6538.jpeg
    FFB1AFC2-B9C7-49B1-AED0-BB25685D6538.jpeg
    244.3 KB · Views: 226
Is that temporary flashing on top of the Westinghouse building? I hope so.

Edit: under further inspection it looks like it's temporary.
 
KingB1.jpg


KingB2.jpg


West side...

KingB3.jpg


KingB4.jpg


South side...

KingB5.jpg


Southeast corner...

KingB6.jpg


KingB7.jpg


KingB8.jpg
 

Attachments

  • KingB1.jpg
    KingB1.jpg
    287.6 KB · Views: 377
  • KingB2.jpg
    KingB2.jpg
    331.8 KB · Views: 391
  • KingB3.jpg
    KingB3.jpg
    264.1 KB · Views: 365
  • KingB4.jpg
    KingB4.jpg
    261.8 KB · Views: 333
  • KingB5.jpg
    KingB5.jpg
    289.3 KB · Views: 341
  • KingB6.jpg
    KingB6.jpg
    323.3 KB · Views: 409
  • KingB7.jpg
    KingB7.jpg
    287.6 KB · Views: 367
  • KingB8.jpg
    KingB8.jpg
    127.6 KB · Views: 367

Back
Top