lenaitch
Senior Member
I don't think MTO cleans theirs.
You could well be correct, but do they have many? I've seen a few panels here and there along sound walls, but I'm usually too busy trying not to die.
I don't think MTO cleans theirs.
There is no way to (truthfully) hide this thing, or make it appear to float gracefully. The renders are at least honest, even if the fine details are fanciful (those fences across the bikepath really amuse me.... what will the cyclists say when they put them in ?)
What I do like is that the vertical screening appears to have been better integrated into the side of the structure. Some of the initial drawings sure made it look like an afterthought. If that detail is accurate, as opposed to artwork, the guideway may be a little more attractive, even if it's more bulky.
- Paul
65 Wade Ave^ Where is that located?
If this remains a privately owned space they could lock the gates at night to make sure a tent city does not sprout underneath this overpass. Residents may be apprehensive about this.
Likely related to this:
Catalyst at 77 Wade | 43.72m | 7s | Seeker Labs | DIALOG
Why enshrine building height restrictions or any other building code into law if they are only to routinely be ignored and overridden? And yes, no one has an inherent right to sunshine. But everyone doesn’t have right to have a say in how their neighbourhood looks in regard to major changes...urbantoronto.ca
According to this metrolinx presentation,
This area is the "construction laydown area"
In theory maybe. In reality? I'd imagine an enclosed area and fences create a more inviting habitat. You're basically creating four walls to build...a fairly sweet shelter.
R.O.W vs Wade. Who's right?