EnviroTO
Senior Member
No, that is the current model. People who have their property vandalized, littered on, or dumped on need to clean up their own property even though they weren't responsible with no assistance from the government and because no police are doing anything to catch people nobody is caught to pay for it.So a property owner, perhaps one not directly victimized by graffiti, gets to pay for both the presence and absence of law enforcement.
Not policing and not sharing the burdens evenly is basically putting all the burdens on victims.
Last edited: