Jaye101
Active Member
Would be a good location for a station, I just hope they don't have to knock my house down to do it. Eek.
Another milestone!
View attachment 466713
Absolutely flying by this morning. Anyone bitching about speed over this thing either hasn't seen it in action yet, or is just trolling.
Do train drivers need new training for this sort of infrastructure, or do they just follow signals?
They definitely need practice. Most likely there will be written Special Instructions or General Bulletin Orders added to their reference documents, covering any unusual requirements or restrictions. And it will be added to their simulator content, I’m sure.
Would some of the VIA engineers have been out there with the GO crews on Monday, even though it wasn't any of their equipment used in the exercise?
This is my favorite angle of the guideway. Your posts are great.Another milestone!
View attachment 466713
Absolutely flying by this morning. Anyone bitching about speed over this thing either hasn't seen it in action yet, or is just trolling.
Any video of the higher speed run?This is my favorite angle of the guideway. Your posts are great.
The operating bulletin I was given had zone speeds of 60 and 45 North of the bridge. However there might be further gbos that I'm not aware of.It could be as simple as that there hasn't been enough tonnage over the ballasted parts of the line to lift the speed restrictions on them, or as you note, continued construction in the area.
Dan
Are there still slow orders due to construction?I rode the 19:53 northbound to Aurora today (RIP off-peak trains), and it was crawling over the guideway. We went up the ramp at about 64 km/h, the speed rose to about 68 along the top and they braked to 64 for the ramp back down. Hopefully those speeds are not representative of the track speeds.
Timetable speed is 60 mph northbound up to roughly just north where the ramp starts to decend and goes down to 45 mph.I rode the 19:53 northbound to Aurora today (RIP off-peak trains), and it was crawling over the guideway. We went up the ramp at about 64 km/h, the speed rose to about 68 along the top and they braked to 64 for the ramp back down. Hopefully those speeds are not representative of the track speeds.
I wonder why it needs to slow to 45 mph (72 km/h) for the north side ramp. Hopefully that's something related to the temporary track shift rather than a permanent limitation with the designTimetable speed is 60 mph northbound up to roughly just north where the ramp starts to decend and goes down to 45 mph.