Ladies Mile
Active Member
Pant pant pant!
Whoosh!
Whoosh!
I agree. It's close to a threadjack, which is bad manners on everyone's part.oh, let's not make it into something like that. i won't pursue these sorts of things.
Please excuse my aggressive tone, but I have tired of the idea that the 19th century was some storehouse of lost craftsmanship or treasure trove of splendor. It was a time of rapid slum growth, driven by factory work and punctuated with some of the ugliest buildings ever erected on this planet. The only decent bits were those that led directly away from the 19th century's two-faced embrace of the satanic mills on one hand and sham Gothic/Baroque fake upper-class romanticism on the other--to whit, the development of industrial materials and the new approach to architecture exemplified by Sullivan and a handful like him.
I can see the factories as a necessary evil, yes--without them we wouldn't have established a general middle-class way of life for millions of people (although millions more are still left behind globally). But I am not going to fake cultural orgasm over heaps of sequined rubble that deck chandeliers an salons with glittering gems and confine servants to quarters and staircases unfit for shipyard rats.
... though Diamond+Schmitt have conquered with their modest and legible architecture - their Toronto Style opera house being an example of a highly sought-after solution to building performing arts buildings, both in Canada and abroad. Denying our superiority and constantly spamming threads about local architects with images of buildings that have nothing to do with them but are designed by foreign firms, as you do, is the real bore. In fact, you're the real bore, PeeEnd.
Making a spectacle of ourselves is something we've avoided, thankfully.
... you're the real bore...