You are confusing me with someone else.
My concerns are 1) that this project is not built for the people who will live in it, or for the people who'll live around it, and 2) that it will set a precedent whereby ignoring every single rule in the book is acceptable when coming up with a proposal.
Density won't be a problem with this project. It will be however if it sets a precedent for surrounding lots. City planners did their best to ensure Festival Tower did not do this, but it did... and it's in that context that we must make a decision today.
Then perhaps it's the 'rules' which should be questioned, not the resulting buildings. Is the area any worse off because of Festival Tower or the subsequent projects it produced?