vic
Senior Member
I just keep getting reminded of these kinds of things....
The cladding is punchy (it looks like a storage facility) but underneath it's the same old Toronto housing typology.
Its relationship to its namesake park feels entirely ambivalent. Even worse, that elevation along a residential street of old Victorians feels particularly in appropriate - a flat facade with punched windows and no attempt at articulation.
I dig it. It's the kind of building that wouldn't be out of place in Amsterdam. Glad to have a little of that here in Toronto.
Well said. For what it's worth I appreciate the contrast between the new building and the older stock it's situated amidst. That's the kind of contrast I enjoy seeing in an urban environment. What I don't like to see, in terms of built form, is the tyranny of sameness; I would rather see a vibrant variety of architectural relationships, even if that occasionally includes awkward ones.It can't be too many more posts before someone calls it an eye soar, so I'll just jump in an preempt that: it's an eyesore, a playful and important one that will divide people forever, but which we need around to at least force the occasional conversation about being more bold about our choices… like the conversation picking up again here.