Chuck
Senior Member
Density hub is stretching it a bit. Bessarion surely isn't a hub of anything.
You're right, Sheppard between Yonge and Don Mills is inexplicably a dense urban thoroughfare. I was driving along that stretch mid-afternoon the other day and I maybe saw five people walking. I might've seen a cyclist, too!
So what's your argument? That the subway should only be built to spur redevelopment? That only through almost two decades of rezoning and forced densification that the subway is justifiable? Maybe all the rezoning and condos are a result of the city trying to get a return on a poor investment?
We all need to stop forcing Sheppard to be something that it is not. Although transit and especially the subway can be strongly linked to new development, subways exist first and foremost to move large volumes of passengers. In the suburbs, that means drawing people from a larger geographical area and feeder bus routes.
Sheppard doesn't need to transform into College in order for the subway to be called a success. In this part of town, the benefit of condos is that they allow the population to grow without depending on greenfield developments. Being situated along a subway line that was needed anyway is the icing on the cake.
Think of the Sheppard subway as just one part of a growing network. As transit in the suburbs becomes more and more convenient, ridership will grow through latent demand. In this part of town, which is so close to employment nodes in the 905 area, allowing free transfers between transit systems will go a long way toward boosting ridership too.




