Tuck
Active Member
Then why design the spines of our transit system around them?The Flexity model is designed to be a tram/streetcar. The Freedom isn't that much different than the Outlooks It's just a marketing name for a LRT system. They aren't designed for mass transit. I agree that the circulation is pretty bad in the Flexitys.
I can't say I understand the infatuation we seem to have with these vehicles to the point that we need them on every line we're building regardless of the role the line plays in the wider network. Yeah yeah yeah, "low floor," how exciting. But the vehicles are boarded from platforms anyways so it barely matters. But the negatives are significant. They have piss poor vehicle circulation, the doors are slow to open and close, they're pretty ricketty, and the door layout is stupid (though this is not the case on the Alstom ones).
They're fine enough for the streetcar network. Serviceable, I suppose, on Finch. But for Eglinton? Put me in the camp that thinks the way this line was designed was a mistake (vehicle choice being one facet of that).




