Toronto eCondos | 195.67m | 58s | Bazis | Rosario Varacalli

Pictures from this week..
E849100D-6452-40C9-9CFD-4F991544403A.jpeg
5D9C7A00-2A64-4167-AD2A-15FEFA3F0547.jpeg
DDBF9859-D061-4B24-A44D-32FA88A3F2C0.jpeg
 

Attachments

  • E849100D-6452-40C9-9CFD-4F991544403A.jpeg
    E849100D-6452-40C9-9CFD-4F991544403A.jpeg
    231.8 KB · Views: 753
  • 5D9C7A00-2A64-4167-AD2A-15FEFA3F0547.jpeg
    5D9C7A00-2A64-4167-AD2A-15FEFA3F0547.jpeg
    212.5 KB · Views: 782
  • DDBF9859-D061-4B24-A44D-32FA88A3F2C0.jpeg
    DDBF9859-D061-4B24-A44D-32FA88A3F2C0.jpeg
    253.7 KB · Views: 775

Attachments

  • AC68ACAF-9C8D-4661-9024-377D18371FD5.jpeg
    AC68ACAF-9C8D-4661-9024-377D18371FD5.jpeg
    258.7 KB · Views: 969
  • 48F9AC15-1D9D-4504-A2D1-2DF3FF3721B5.jpeg
    48F9AC15-1D9D-4504-A2D1-2DF3FF3721B5.jpeg
    203.2 KB · Views: 929
Last edited:
I've complained about the orientation of the larger tower before -- it's arranged to face Yonge Street, which is not actually perpendicular to Eglinton, whereas all the other buildings on Eglinton orient to that street. This makes the E Condos tower the odd one out in the street wall. But I hadn't realized until seeing them that the smaller tower is oriented to Roehampton, parallel to Eglinton, and thus the two towers are not oriented to each other, either:

IMG_0171.jpg


Maybe I'm too hung up on symmetry, but the angle just feels weird to me -- not enough to feel intentional or have a pleasing effect, but just enough to notice it's "off".
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0171.jpg
    IMG_0171.jpg
    178 KB · Views: 964
I've complained about the orientation of the larger tower before -- it's arranged to face Yonge Street, which is not actually perpendicular to Eglinton, whereas all the other buildings on Eglinton orient to that street. This makes the E Condos tower the odd one out in the street wall. But I hadn't realized until seeing them that the smaller tower is oriented to Roehampton, parallel to Eglinton, and thus the two towers are not oriented to each other, either:

View attachment 150610

Maybe I'm too hung up on symmetry, but the angle just feels weird to me -- not enough to feel intentional or have a pleasing effect, but just enough to notice it's "off".

I adore the lack of symmetry and think we need much more of it in the city. It's those sorts of details (among many others, of course), that differentiate Toronto -- with its crop of generally bland North American Anywheresville contemporary towers -- from the downtown cores of most American cities.

Give me lots of weird angles and offsets, please.
 
Some angles provide thoughtful artistry -- this just looks sloppy. (Again, the specific angle wasn't really chosen, it was dictated by the angle of Yonge at Eglinton.)
 
Some angles provide thoughtful artistry -- this just looks sloppy. (Again, the specific angle wasn't really chosen, it was dictated by the angle of Yonge at Eglinton.)

Those are some of the best types, to my eye -- one of the things I love about so much of the architecture (tall and otherwise) in Tokyo are the crazily shaped sites, which are often dictated by the winding and angled roads.
 

Back
Top