Wildymyst
Active Member
I agree that it's easier to identify the area and where the condos are by calling it the Ikea condos by location association. You can also probably call it the Canadian Tire condos or the North York General Hospital condos as well but it's not as catchy as Ikea with flags waving.
I would disagree with the stigma the poster commented in the video link as I'd evaluate the build quality after I see one of the units inside and then outside myself. I think the prices for these units are getting expensive because of it's location. I'm neutral in their design. It's fitting for the area. What do you want me to say? It doesn't suck, but it's not quite the Trump Tower condo and hotel, and Shangri La projects being built downtown right now.
When you look at the location, the surrounding infrastructure and the likelihood at the type of people that may be moving in that area, I think it's a very good area and a very interesting community when more buildings and the community are formed.
Minus the known issues of increase traffic congestion, you have an area with it's own sense of style and theme. You could name other master plan communities like the NY Towers, Emerald City, The Legacy (Monarch), Metrogate, Regent Park or Liberty Village and it's just as easy to pick it apart architecturally, interior design wise, intended customer base etc... because most of the buildings are based loosely with a general theme or style and a whole bunch of them will be built similarly. Some people like it, some people don't, and some are in the "neither" and have no emotions either way.
Last edited: