HousingNowTO
Senior Member
Asking some fundamental questions about this site before it goes to Council this week -
There was a rendering of the library in brad Bradfords most recent newsletter. It was not what I’d expected and quite honestly disappointing. It’s early and only exterior but far from what I’d hoped for. I’ll send a photo of the rendering shortly.
The perspective you’ve got is better but completely agree with you. This is what I saw. Imo for what It’s worth … not sure this is “Mayors design award” …I'm afraid I'm going to beat you to it............
Thanks for the tip........... took me a moment, but I found it on his Facebook Account.
View attachment 369470
Too opaque right off the bat. 100% needs more windows.
Need to see the Chapman (side street) frontage to better assess it.
Certainly original; but maybe a bit too much so for this site.
I’m not an architect, or designer, simply Joe public. But in my opinion a graphical facade is not necessarily great design. For a community on the edge of revitalization, I personally think more should be expected. It’s early, the interiors could be amazing but I hope we see further iterations. I agree w @Northern Light - it reads a bit cold and is not super engaging to the street (or community).You've got the Chapman side in that rendering. Same issue as the Dawes side..........needs more transparency.
Also reads as a bit cold......
You've got the Chapman side in that rendering. Same issue as the Dawes side..........needs more transparency.
Also reads as a bit cold......
I'm afraid I'm going to beat you to it............
Thanks for the tip........... took me a moment, but I found it on his Facebook Account.
View attachment 369470
Too opaque right off the bat. 100% needs more windows.
Need to see the Chapman (side street) frontage to better assess it.
Certainly original; but maybe a bit too much so for this site.
Direct sunlight and books don't mix. It fades the spines / jackets and degrades the binding far quicker than temperate, indirectly lit, environments. This is why most of the great libraries are usually largely windowless. I mean, we're not going to get Beinecke here, but still, the image is illustrative of how to keep a collection safe and healthy:You've got the Chapman side in that rendering. Same issue as the Dawes side..........needs more transparency.
Also reads as a bit cold......
Direct sunlight and books don't mix. It fades the spines / jackets and degrades the binding far quicker than temperate, indirectly lit, environments. This is why most of the great libraries are usually largely windowless. I mean, we're not going to get Beinecke here, but still, the image is illustrative of how to keep a collection safe and healthy:
Direct sunlight and books don't mix. It fades the spines / jackets and degrades the binding far quicker than temperate, indirectly lit, environments. This is why most of the great libraries are usually largely windowless. I mean, we're not going to get Beinecke here, but still, the image is illustrative of how to keep a collection safe and healthy:
Sooo...that Robarts Library Renovations thing is a deviation from this philosophy? >.<Direct sunlight and books don't mix. It fades the spines / jackets and degrades the binding far quicker than temperate, indirectly lit, environments. This is why most of the great libraries are usually largely windowless. I mean, we're not going to get Beinecke here, but still, the image is illustrative of how to keep a collection safe and healthy: