MisterF
Senior Member
On paper you're right, but if you look at how it was designed as a soccer-specific stadium right off the bat (requiring part of it to be torn down for allow the Argos to play), how the main colour scheme is red rather than blue, and how the Argos dressing room is in an awful location with no direct field access, I'd say it is functionally and emotionally still more TFC's than the Argos.
Yes, as I said, it was built for soccer despite the original intent for it to be for football as well. The renovations bring it closer to what it was supposed to be. The branding is all TFC but now that MLSE owns the Argos too I wouldn't be surprised to see that change at some point.It was designed and built with football in mind and has had its pitch ruined ever since those fake rugby cats moved in.
I can agree on your last point though......my maturation process is ever ongoing.
The Argos aren't going anywhere. Even in the team's current state there's no way the league would give up a presence in the country's biggest city.