S
scarberiankhatru
Guest
"Brussels is a perfect example of a Pre-Metro system where LRT runs in subway tunnels that are built before the line is long enough or heavily enough used to be a full subway with heavy rail equipment."
But that's the whole point I'm making - you seem to think that if extended to Downsview and STC, the ridership would stay below 50,000 per day...can those pre-metro LRTs handle 100,000 or 120,000 riders a day? If they can, can they handle twice that to allow for future growth? If they can't, why would the city spend a billion dollars, close the Sheppard line for a few years, remove the option of fast express buses on Sheppard, take lanes away from cars, only to end up with something that has a lower capacity?
But that's the whole point I'm making - you seem to think that if extended to Downsview and STC, the ridership would stay below 50,000 per day...can those pre-metro LRTs handle 100,000 or 120,000 riders a day? If they can, can they handle twice that to allow for future growth? If they can't, why would the city spend a billion dollars, close the Sheppard line for a few years, remove the option of fast express buses on Sheppard, take lanes away from cars, only to end up with something that has a lower capacity?