holographic plastic
Active Member
I've felt the same way for a long time as well. When I was very young even then I remember thinking it was strange how many 2-3 storey houses were so close to the city centre. Now that I'm older and I realize they're largely inhabited by wealthy people, it makes more sense why there always seems to be such a pushback against new developments if it dares to disturb some rich person and the precious "character" of the neighbourhood.I'll explain how. If we decide that a privileged (rich) few get to live in large homes in the middle (literally downtown) of a metropolitan city, we're saying that their comfort matters more than building density. For example, why can't sites like this be treated like The Selby? https://urbantoronto.ca/database/projects/selby
We can build a LOT of density while preserving our history. We don't because we don't want to displace the rich and almost exclusively white voters in the area.
So yes, saying "heritage" and then fighting over the smallest of density is a dog whistle. This location should have a building on it with a MINIMUM of 6 stories, not laneways.